"I'm not altogether certain that a fundamentalism of necessity has to argue that it is the only reading of the human experience in order to stay alive"
About this Quote
Potok’s sentence moves like a careful scalpel: it refuses the easy villainy of “fundamentalism” as pure fanaticism and instead isolates a more intimate engine - necessity. He’s talking about the kind of belief system that forms under pressure, when a community feels cornered by assimilation, trauma, or history’s churn. In that scenario, strictness isn’t just ideology; it’s shelter. The sting comes in the second half: why must that shelter advertise itself as the only habitable house?
The key phrase is “fundamentalism of necessity,” which slyly implies there are other kinds - elective, performative, power-seeking - but this one is defensive, born from survival instincts. Potok, whose fiction often stages the collision between devout Jewish worlds and modern intellectual life, understands how fragile identity can feel when it’s surrounded. The subtext is pastoral as much as political: insisting on exclusivity may keep a community coherent, but it also converts faith into a border wall. It turns a living tradition into a single authorized “reading” and treats alternative interpretations not as cousins but as contaminants.
Potok’s intent isn’t to dunk on belief; it’s to ask whether survival requires epistemic monopoly. The line “in order to stay alive” lands like an accusation and a plea at once: if the price of continuity is declaring everyone else wrong, what kind of life is that? He’s inviting a third option - resilience without absolutism - and hinting how rare, and how courageous, that option can be.
The key phrase is “fundamentalism of necessity,” which slyly implies there are other kinds - elective, performative, power-seeking - but this one is defensive, born from survival instincts. Potok, whose fiction often stages the collision between devout Jewish worlds and modern intellectual life, understands how fragile identity can feel when it’s surrounded. The subtext is pastoral as much as political: insisting on exclusivity may keep a community coherent, but it also converts faith into a border wall. It turns a living tradition into a single authorized “reading” and treats alternative interpretations not as cousins but as contaminants.
Potok’s intent isn’t to dunk on belief; it’s to ask whether survival requires epistemic monopoly. The line “in order to stay alive” lands like an accusation and a plea at once: if the price of continuity is declaring everyone else wrong, what kind of life is that? He’s inviting a third option - resilience without absolutism - and hinting how rare, and how courageous, that option can be.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Chaim
Add to List
