"I'm not going to name some of my colleagues who are very well-known for their television presentation, but they wouldn't know new information or how to report a story if it came up and bit them"
About this Quote
Woodward’s line lands like a dagger wrapped in newsroom etiquette: he “won’t name” names while making sure everyone can hear the names anyway. It’s classic Washington knife-fighting - the pretense of restraint functioning as the sharpest possible insinuation. By invoking the “very well-known” TV crowd, he draws a bright border between journalism as performance and journalism as labor: digging, verifying, cultivating sources, and understanding what’s actually new.
The insult is calibrated. “Wouldn’t know new information” isn’t just a jab at intelligence; it’s an accusation of dulled news judgment, the central skill the job claims to reward. The phrase “how to report a story” widens the charge from individual incompetence to professional fraud. He’s not mad that they’re wrong sometimes. He’s saying they don’t practice the craft at all, because the incentives of television - speed, certainty, personality - punish the slow ambiguities that real reporting produces.
The “bit them” kicker is doing cultural work. It paints “new information” as an obvious, physical thing, something that should trigger reflexive recognition. If even that doesn’t register, then the problem isn’t access or resources; it’s a system that has trained prominent faces to treat fresh facts as props, not obligations.
Context matters: Woodward is the embodiment of legacy reporting prestige, and this is a defense of that hierarchy at a moment when cable news and punditry have blurred the public’s sense of what a journalist is. It’s gatekeeping, yes - but it’s also a warning about a media ecosystem that confuses being on TV with doing the job.
The insult is calibrated. “Wouldn’t know new information” isn’t just a jab at intelligence; it’s an accusation of dulled news judgment, the central skill the job claims to reward. The phrase “how to report a story” widens the charge from individual incompetence to professional fraud. He’s not mad that they’re wrong sometimes. He’s saying they don’t practice the craft at all, because the incentives of television - speed, certainty, personality - punish the slow ambiguities that real reporting produces.
The “bit them” kicker is doing cultural work. It paints “new information” as an obvious, physical thing, something that should trigger reflexive recognition. If even that doesn’t register, then the problem isn’t access or resources; it’s a system that has trained prominent faces to treat fresh facts as props, not obligations.
Context matters: Woodward is the embodiment of legacy reporting prestige, and this is a defense of that hierarchy at a moment when cable news and punditry have blurred the public’s sense of what a journalist is. It’s gatekeeping, yes - but it’s also a warning about a media ecosystem that confuses being on TV with doing the job.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Bob
Add to List







