"I'm not in the judgment part of journalism"
About this Quote
Lehrer’s line reads like a modesty play, but it’s really a declaration of power: the authority to look neutral. Coming from the anchor chair of PBS’s NewsHour, “I’m not in the judgment part of journalism” positions him as a conduit rather than a combatant, the guy who keeps his fingerprints off the evidence. The phrasing matters. He doesn’t say judgment is bad; he says it’s not his department. That’s a professional boundary framed as an ethical virtue.
The subtext is older-school broadcast legitimacy: if the audience trusts your restraint, they’ll trust your facts. In the late 20th century, when Lehrer became a defining face of public-affairs TV, “objectivity” wasn’t just a method; it was a brand promise. His calm, careful cadence offered a counter-image to the opinion economy before it fully metastasized into today’s outrage-driven ecosystem. The sentence works because it flatters the viewer’s sense of being rational: you’re not being sold a take, you’re being given the raw material to make your own.
But the line also reveals the paradox of “no judgment” journalism. Deciding what counts as news, which guests get a chair, how questions are framed, when to press and when to let something slide - those are judgments, just dressed in procedural clothing. Lehrer’s intent isn’t to deny that reality so much as to insist on a different kind of accountability: fewer verdicts, more clarity. In an era where “just the facts” can sound naive or evasive, the quote survives as a cultural fossil of trust - and a challenge to earn it without pretending neutrality is invisible.
The subtext is older-school broadcast legitimacy: if the audience trusts your restraint, they’ll trust your facts. In the late 20th century, when Lehrer became a defining face of public-affairs TV, “objectivity” wasn’t just a method; it was a brand promise. His calm, careful cadence offered a counter-image to the opinion economy before it fully metastasized into today’s outrage-driven ecosystem. The sentence works because it flatters the viewer’s sense of being rational: you’re not being sold a take, you’re being given the raw material to make your own.
But the line also reveals the paradox of “no judgment” journalism. Deciding what counts as news, which guests get a chair, how questions are framed, when to press and when to let something slide - those are judgments, just dressed in procedural clothing. Lehrer’s intent isn’t to deny that reality so much as to insist on a different kind of accountability: fewer verdicts, more clarity. In an era where “just the facts” can sound naive or evasive, the quote survives as a cultural fossil of trust - and a challenge to earn it without pretending neutrality is invisible.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List



