"I'm not sure I can say there is a clean line between me as an individual and me as a lawyer"
About this Quote
As a law professor and a public figure defined, in the popular imagination, by the Clarence Thomas hearings, Hill is speaking from a place where the law is never just abstract doctrine. Her career has been lived in the glare of a system that treats credibility, gender, and race as evidence while insisting it's merely applying rules. The subtext is that the law doesn't simply mediate identity; it manufactures it. What counts as "reasonable", whose memory reads as "reliable", who gets cast as "objective" or "biased" are legal categories with social fingerprints all over them.
The intent isn't confession so much as an argument about power: if you are trained to speak in the register of authority, that register reshapes you, and the world reshapes you through it. Hill's sentence resists the comforting fiction that the lawyer is a detached instrument. It insists that the self enters the courtroom, the classroom, and the public record whether institutions acknowledge it or not.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work-Life Balance |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Hill, Anita. (2026, January 15). I'm not sure I can say there is a clean line between me as an individual and me as a lawyer. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/im-not-sure-i-can-say-there-is-a-clean-line-140237/
Chicago Style
Hill, Anita. "I'm not sure I can say there is a clean line between me as an individual and me as a lawyer." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/im-not-sure-i-can-say-there-is-a-clean-line-140237/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"I'm not sure I can say there is a clean line between me as an individual and me as a lawyer." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/im-not-sure-i-can-say-there-is-a-clean-line-140237/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.






