"I'm not very interested in charting a day-to-day familiar reality. I'm always looking for territory in which to explore the BIG subjects, the life-or-death stories"
About this Quote
Tremain draws a clean border between reportage and revelation. The “day-to-day familiar reality” she rejects isn’t an insult to ordinary life so much as a refusal of the dutiful, domestic novel that catalogs feelings the way a ledger catalogs expenses. Her phrasing is quietly combative: “not very interested” softens the blow, but the subtext is a manifesto. She’s staking out what she thinks fiction is for.
The key word is “territory.” Tremain frames storytelling as exploration, implying risk, distance, and the possibility of getting lost. That metaphor lets her claim ambition without sounding grandiose: she’s not chasing “BIG subjects” as a prestige badge, she’s crossing into them like a traveler who can’t unsee what’s beyond the map. The capitalization of “BIG” (whether hers or an interviewer’s emphasis) reads like impatience with genteel understatement. It’s also a wink at the industry’s split between “quiet” realism and the supposedly larger canvas of historical upheaval, moral extremity, and existential choice.
“Life-or-death stories” is where the intent tightens. She’s asserting that the novel’s job is to compress experience to its pressure points: moments when character is forced into view by consequence. In a literary culture that often rewards the carefully observed minutiae of middle-class life, Tremain argues for stakes as an ethical requirement, not a plot trick. The context of her career matters here: a writer known for historical settings and characters under social and physical duress, she’s defending fiction as a laboratory for mortality, power, and desire - the stuff that makes “reality” feel newly unfamiliar.
The key word is “territory.” Tremain frames storytelling as exploration, implying risk, distance, and the possibility of getting lost. That metaphor lets her claim ambition without sounding grandiose: she’s not chasing “BIG subjects” as a prestige badge, she’s crossing into them like a traveler who can’t unsee what’s beyond the map. The capitalization of “BIG” (whether hers or an interviewer’s emphasis) reads like impatience with genteel understatement. It’s also a wink at the industry’s split between “quiet” realism and the supposedly larger canvas of historical upheaval, moral extremity, and existential choice.
“Life-or-death stories” is where the intent tightens. She’s asserting that the novel’s job is to compress experience to its pressure points: moments when character is forced into view by consequence. In a literary culture that often rewards the carefully observed minutiae of middle-class life, Tremain argues for stakes as an ethical requirement, not a plot trick. The context of her career matters here: a writer known for historical settings and characters under social and physical duress, she’s defending fiction as a laboratory for mortality, power, and desire - the stuff that makes “reality” feel newly unfamiliar.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Rose
Add to List



