"I'm proof against that word failure. I've seen behind it. The only failure a man ought to fear is failure of cleaving to the purpose he sees to be best"
About this Quote
“Failure” is the kind of word society uses as a verdict: not just an outcome, but a character sentence. Eliot refuses the tribunal. “I’ve seen behind it” is the key move, suggesting that failure isn’t a fact of nature so much as a social construction-a label pasted onto messy, nonlinear lives to make them legible and punishable. The speaker isn’t claiming invulnerability; she’s claiming x-ray vision. Once you see how the word is wielded, it loses its sting.
Eliot’s pivot is moral, not motivational: the only failure worth fearing is “failure of cleaving to the purpose he sees to be best.” That phrase makes integrity tactile. “Cleaving” is stubborn, almost physical fidelity, the opposite of drifting with fashion or panic. It also puts the burden on perception: “he sees to be best” admits that purpose is chosen under uncertainty, not guaranteed by applause or results. She’s not sanctifying stubbornness for its own sake; she’s arguing that a life should be judged by its devotion to an examined good, not by public scorekeeping.
In Eliot’s context-a woman writing under a male pen name, criticized for her unconventional partnership and for the seriousness of her art-this reads like self-defense sharpened into philosophy. She’s relocating the argument from reputation to conscience, from career outcomes to ethical continuity. The subtext is bracing: you can lose status, money, even love, and still not be “a failure” if you didn’t betray what you believed was right.
Eliot’s pivot is moral, not motivational: the only failure worth fearing is “failure of cleaving to the purpose he sees to be best.” That phrase makes integrity tactile. “Cleaving” is stubborn, almost physical fidelity, the opposite of drifting with fashion or panic. It also puts the burden on perception: “he sees to be best” admits that purpose is chosen under uncertainty, not guaranteed by applause or results. She’s not sanctifying stubbornness for its own sake; she’s arguing that a life should be judged by its devotion to an examined good, not by public scorekeeping.
In Eliot’s context-a woman writing under a male pen name, criticized for her unconventional partnership and for the seriousness of her art-this reads like self-defense sharpened into philosophy. She’s relocating the argument from reputation to conscience, from career outcomes to ethical continuity. The subtext is bracing: you can lose status, money, even love, and still not be “a failure” if you didn’t betray what you believed was right.
Quote Details
| Topic | Perseverance |
|---|
More Quotes by George
Add to List
