"I'm still strongly opposed to antismoking laws, strongly opposed to any law that regulates personal behavior"
About this Quote
Barlow is doing a classic libertarian two-step here: frame the issue as private choice, then treat the state as the real hazard. By starting with "I'm still", he signals a veteran stance, not a hot take - a man who has watched moral crusades rebrand themselves and refuses to budge. The repetition of "strongly opposed" isn't just emphasis; it's a prophylactic against the inevitable charge that he's soft on smoking. He isn't defending cigarettes. He's defending a boundary.
The cleverness is in the phrase "regulates personal behavior". Antismoking laws are commonly sold as public-health common sense, but Barlow recasts them as behavioral policing, sliding them into the same category as Prohibition or censorship. That move matters: it relocates the debate from lungs and hospitals to autonomy and control. It's also a subtle bet on audience identity. If you see yourself as a competent adult rather than a risk to be managed, the quote flatters you into agreement.
Context sharpens the intent. Barlow, a writer and founding digital-liberties voice (and a onetime lyricist for the Grateful Dead), comes out of a late-20th-century American strain of anti-authoritarianism: suspicious of institutions, protective of subcultures, allergic to bureaucratic paternalism. The subtext is that today's "health" rationale will become tomorrow's template. If the government can micro-manage your ashtray, it can micro-manage your speech, your data, your body.
It's also strategically blunt. By refusing to carve out exceptions, he makes the slippery slope argument without having to narrate the slope. That absolutism is the point - and the risk. It reads as principled clarity to allies, and as indifference to externalities to everyone else.
The cleverness is in the phrase "regulates personal behavior". Antismoking laws are commonly sold as public-health common sense, but Barlow recasts them as behavioral policing, sliding them into the same category as Prohibition or censorship. That move matters: it relocates the debate from lungs and hospitals to autonomy and control. It's also a subtle bet on audience identity. If you see yourself as a competent adult rather than a risk to be managed, the quote flatters you into agreement.
Context sharpens the intent. Barlow, a writer and founding digital-liberties voice (and a onetime lyricist for the Grateful Dead), comes out of a late-20th-century American strain of anti-authoritarianism: suspicious of institutions, protective of subcultures, allergic to bureaucratic paternalism. The subtext is that today's "health" rationale will become tomorrow's template. If the government can micro-manage your ashtray, it can micro-manage your speech, your data, your body.
It's also strategically blunt. By refusing to carve out exceptions, he makes the slippery slope argument without having to narrate the slope. That absolutism is the point - and the risk. It reads as principled clarity to allies, and as indifference to externalities to everyone else.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List




