"I'm sure any vocal teacher that listens to me would rather cut my throat than do anything - I do everything all wrong - but I think for me that's the best - because I don't think I have a voice so I think what I project would be style - if I learned to sing I'd lose my style"

Julie London's quote provides a raw and candid insight into her perception of her own vocal abilities and the principle of design in her music. Her words expose an ingrained humility, as she honestly acknowledges that her singing may not comply with conventional technical standards. The exaggerated images of a singing teacher wishing to "cut [her] throat" highlights her belief that her method to singing is non-traditional to the point of being nearly sacrilegious to trained experts.

Nevertheless, what makes this statement especially interesting is London's assertion that this perceived absence of technical efficiency is specifically what specifies her style. She recommends that her credibility and distinct sound come from her imperfections, meaning a broader creative viewpoint where personal expression and individuality exceed technical mastery. In saying, "I do not believe I have a voice so I believe what I predict would be design", London accepts the idea that music is not simply about sticking to standard requirements but about conveying feeling and personality.

This perspective challenges the traditional notion that technical skills are critical in music. Instead, London presumes that style, which she equates with authenticity and uniqueness, is what genuinely resonates with audiences. Her reluctance to formalize her singing through training indicates a worry that doing so could strip away the very essence of what makes her unique as an artist.

In a broader context, London's ideas can be viewed as a recommendation of creative stability, suggesting that true artistry originates from within and is frequently identified by the determination to accept one's imperfections. Her words are a suggestion that the beauty of music lies in its diversity and the myriad methods it can be revealed, regardless of conventional requirements. This point of view uses valuable insight into the balance between ability and credibility in innovative endeavors.