"I'm very disturbed by violence against women when it is violence"
About this Quote
The line lands like a deadpan pratfall: a moral stance so narrowly phrased it collapses into tautology. Helen Garner, a novelist who’s spent decades circling the messy collisions of sex, power, and accusation in public life, knows exactly how that sounds. The awkwardness isn’t an accident; it’s the point. By stapling her outrage to the clause “when it is violence,” she exposes how quickly righteous language can become a performance, and how often the argument turns on definitions rather than harm.
The specific intent reads as defensive precision. Garner has been criticised for her willingness to scrutinise cases that arrive pre-packaged with correct opinions. This sentence signals a refusal to sign on to an all-purpose slogan. She’s not denying that women are harmed; she’s warning that the category “violence” gets stretched, politicised, and sometimes used to shut down inquiry. The phrasing is deliberately clumsy, as if she’s showing the gears: you want certainty, but certainty depends on what you’re willing to call violence.
The subtext is a quarrel with contemporary moral shorthand. “Violence against women” can operate as an unarguable banner, and Garner is prying at that rhetorical shield: if everything becomes violence, then nothing is examined with care; if only the most visible harms count, then the quieter coercions disappear. The line works because it stages the discomfort of that bind in real time, forcing the reader to notice how much of this debate is a fight over language that carries legal and social consequences.
The specific intent reads as defensive precision. Garner has been criticised for her willingness to scrutinise cases that arrive pre-packaged with correct opinions. This sentence signals a refusal to sign on to an all-purpose slogan. She’s not denying that women are harmed; she’s warning that the category “violence” gets stretched, politicised, and sometimes used to shut down inquiry. The phrasing is deliberately clumsy, as if she’s showing the gears: you want certainty, but certainty depends on what you’re willing to call violence.
The subtext is a quarrel with contemporary moral shorthand. “Violence against women” can operate as an unarguable banner, and Garner is prying at that rhetorical shield: if everything becomes violence, then nothing is examined with care; if only the most visible harms count, then the quieter coercions disappear. The line works because it stages the discomfort of that bind in real time, forcing the reader to notice how much of this debate is a fight over language that carries legal and social consequences.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Helen
Add to List
