"I'm very skeptical about the good intentions of Milosevic"
About this Quote
Skepticism is doing a lot of diplomatic labor here. When Warren Christopher says, "I'm very skeptical about the good intentions of Milosevic", he’s not just offering a personal hunch; he’s issuing a controlled warning in the language of statecraft. The phrase "good intentions" is a soft glove over a hard accusation: that Slobodan Milosevic’s stated aims in the Balkans were a cover for coercion, ethnic violence, and strategic delay. Christopher doesn’t need to enumerate atrocities; the audience in the mid-1990s already had the images, the casualty counts, the siege footage. What he needs is a public posture that prepares policy.
The intent is tactical. Christopher, as U.S. Secretary of State, had to balance negotiation with credibility: keep diplomatic channels open while signaling that Washington would not be endlessly played by performative concessions. "Very skeptical" is calibrated mistrust - strong enough to justify pressure (sanctions, isolation, the possibility of force), restrained enough to avoid collapsing talks or cornering allies into a maximalist stance.
The subtext is also about persuasion at home. In democracies, foreign policy needs a narrative that can survive congressional hearings and cable news. Skepticism frames any future escalation as reluctant, even responsible: we tried; we watched; we were not naive. It’s a preemptive defense against the charge that engagement equals appeasement, and an invitation for partners to read Milosevic the same way - not as a misunderstood nationalist, but as an operator whose "intentions" are instrumental, not moral.
The intent is tactical. Christopher, as U.S. Secretary of State, had to balance negotiation with credibility: keep diplomatic channels open while signaling that Washington would not be endlessly played by performative concessions. "Very skeptical" is calibrated mistrust - strong enough to justify pressure (sanctions, isolation, the possibility of force), restrained enough to avoid collapsing talks or cornering allies into a maximalist stance.
The subtext is also about persuasion at home. In democracies, foreign policy needs a narrative that can survive congressional hearings and cable news. Skepticism frames any future escalation as reluctant, even responsible: we tried; we watched; we were not naive. It’s a preemptive defense against the charge that engagement equals appeasement, and an invitation for partners to read Milosevic the same way - not as a misunderstood nationalist, but as an operator whose "intentions" are instrumental, not moral.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Warren
Add to List




