"Imagination is not the exclusive appanage of artists, but belongs in varying degrees to all men"
About this Quote
Lewes is quietly detonating a Victorian hierarchy. In an era that loved its boxes - genius vs. drudge, artist vs. laborer, “men of letters” vs. the masses - he insists that imagination isn’t a rare organ possessed only by the culturally ordained. It’s a human faculty distributed on a spectrum. The word choice does the work: “exclusive appanage” is legalistic, almost feudal, as if imagination were a titled estate passed down to a genteel class. Lewes denies that inheritance, demoting artistic mystique from sacred mystery to a matter of degree.
The subtext is both democratic and disciplinary. Democratic, because it expands the circle of creative legitimacy: the clerk, the mechanic, the parent improvising solutions all participate in imaginative life. Disciplinary, because it redefines imagination as something that can be cultivated, trained, and tested, not merely revered. That aligns with Lewes’s broader philosophical temperament and his proximity to a 19th-century intellectual world increasingly shaped by empiricism, psychology, and the new authority of science. Creativity becomes adjacent to cognition: a mental operation rather than a divine visitation.
The line also reads as a preemptive strike against the romantic cult of the artist. If imagination belongs to everyone, then art stops being evidence of a separate species and becomes evidence of heightened practice. That’s a subtle but consequential move: it relocates cultural power from birthright to development, from aura to effort. Even the limiting phrase “to all men” carries its own period-bound blind spot, a reminder that this democratization was still being argued inside a society that rationed personhood.
The subtext is both democratic and disciplinary. Democratic, because it expands the circle of creative legitimacy: the clerk, the mechanic, the parent improvising solutions all participate in imaginative life. Disciplinary, because it redefines imagination as something that can be cultivated, trained, and tested, not merely revered. That aligns with Lewes’s broader philosophical temperament and his proximity to a 19th-century intellectual world increasingly shaped by empiricism, psychology, and the new authority of science. Creativity becomes adjacent to cognition: a mental operation rather than a divine visitation.
The line also reads as a preemptive strike against the romantic cult of the artist. If imagination belongs to everyone, then art stops being evidence of a separate species and becomes evidence of heightened practice. That’s a subtle but consequential move: it relocates cultural power from birthright to development, from aura to effort. Even the limiting phrase “to all men” carries its own period-bound blind spot, a reminder that this democratization was still being argued inside a society that rationed personhood.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by George
Add to List







