"Improvisation is a compositional method"
About this Quote
Evan Parker’s line is a quiet flex disguised as a definition. In a jazz world that still defaults to “composition” as the respectable, written-down thing and “improvisation” as the risky, sweaty afterparty, he flips the hierarchy: improvisation isn’t what you do when the real work is over; it is the work.
The intent is partly defensive and partly liberating. Defensive because free improvisers have long been treated as anti-form romantics, allergic to craft. Parker, a central figure in European free improv, insists on the opposite: improvisation has method, structure, memory, and constraint. Liberating because it reframes the musician as a composer in real time, authoring form at the speed of breath. That matters with Parker’s instrument and style in mind: the soprano saxophone, circular breathing, dense multiphonics. The “piece” isn’t a tune you return to; it’s an evolving architecture built from technique, listening, and split-second decisions.
The subtext is political in the small-p sense. It’s a claim for legitimacy outside institutions that sanctify the score, the conservatory, the canon. By calling improvisation “compositional,” Parker smuggles it into the vocabulary that arts funding, critics, and academia tend to trust. It also nudges listeners to change how they listen: not as tourists waiting for a melody, but as witnesses to form being negotiated, revised, and finalized on the spot.
Contextually, it lands as a manifesto for a post-1960s music culture suspicious of fixed narratives. Composition becomes less a document and more a practice - something you do, not something you file.
The intent is partly defensive and partly liberating. Defensive because free improvisers have long been treated as anti-form romantics, allergic to craft. Parker, a central figure in European free improv, insists on the opposite: improvisation has method, structure, memory, and constraint. Liberating because it reframes the musician as a composer in real time, authoring form at the speed of breath. That matters with Parker’s instrument and style in mind: the soprano saxophone, circular breathing, dense multiphonics. The “piece” isn’t a tune you return to; it’s an evolving architecture built from technique, listening, and split-second decisions.
The subtext is political in the small-p sense. It’s a claim for legitimacy outside institutions that sanctify the score, the conservatory, the canon. By calling improvisation “compositional,” Parker smuggles it into the vocabulary that arts funding, critics, and academia tend to trust. It also nudges listeners to change how they listen: not as tourists waiting for a melody, but as witnesses to form being negotiated, revised, and finalized on the spot.
Contextually, it lands as a manifesto for a post-1960s music culture suspicious of fixed narratives. Composition becomes less a document and more a practice - something you do, not something you file.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|
More Quotes by Evan
Add to List
