"In 1917 - as we have seen, - Italy suffered a great reverse, losing 200,000 soldiers and immense supplies"
About this Quote
The chill in Miller's line is how briskly catastrophe is processed into record-keeping. "As we have seen" is the tell: he writes as a guide through an argument already in motion, turning mass death into evidence. The parenthetical dashes mimic an aside in a lecture hall, a reminder that the reader is meant to keep up. That rhetorical posture matters. A "great reverse" sounds almost sporting, a euphemism that lets 200,000 lives sit inside the tidy grammar of setback and supply loss. It’s not callousness so much as an exposure of how modern war forces language to industrialize feeling.
The 1917 context is also doing work. Italy's disaster at Caporetto wasn't just a battlefield defeat; it was a crack in the Allied story of momentum, a moment when morale, logistics, and legitimacy all buckled at once. By pairing "200,000 soldiers" with "immense supplies", Miller signals that the crisis is both human and systemic: bodies and infrastructure, tragedy and capacity. For a sociologist, that pairing is the point. War isn't only heroism or strategy; it’s a stress test of nations as social machines.
Subtextually, Miller’s sentence performs the modern intellectual’s bargain with horror: you count, you classify, you narrate, because comprehension is the only available control. The restraint is the critique. When losses can be folded into a clause, you glimpse how easily publics are trained to accept the unthinkable as a datum.
The 1917 context is also doing work. Italy's disaster at Caporetto wasn't just a battlefield defeat; it was a crack in the Allied story of momentum, a moment when morale, logistics, and legitimacy all buckled at once. By pairing "200,000 soldiers" with "immense supplies", Miller signals that the crisis is both human and systemic: bodies and infrastructure, tragedy and capacity. For a sociologist, that pairing is the point. War isn't only heroism or strategy; it’s a stress test of nations as social machines.
Subtextually, Miller’s sentence performs the modern intellectual’s bargain with horror: you count, you classify, you narrate, because comprehension is the only available control. The restraint is the critique. When losses can be folded into a clause, you glimpse how easily publics are trained to accept the unthinkable as a datum.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kelly
Add to List



