"In a democracy everybody has a right to be represented, including the jerks"
About this Quote
Democracy, Patten reminds us, is not a curated playlist. It is a system built to metabolize the people you would rather mute. The line lands because it refuses the comforting fiction that representation is a prize awarded to virtue. It is a right that attaches to citizenship, even when citizenship arrives with bad manners, worse opinions, and a talent for clogging public life.
Patten’s choice of “jerks” is doing strategic work. It’s blunt, faintly comic, and deliberately non-technical - a politician reaching for the language of everyday irritation instead of constitutional theology. That plainness smuggles in a hard idea: democratic legitimacy depends on including the objectionable, not just tolerating them. If democracy only represents the reasonable, it quickly becomes an instrument for the reasonable to rule, which is how democracies slide into technocracy, paternalism, or moral gatekeeping.
The subtext is aimed at a recurring temptation in liberal politics: to treat certain voters as a mistake that the system should correct rather than a constituency the system must absorb. In moments of polarization - populist surges, culture-war elections, the rise of conspiracy-inflected parties - “the jerks” become a shorthand for the people whose presence feels like sabotage. Patten flips the frame. Their representation isn’t a bug; it’s the democratic stress test.
There’s also an implied warning to elites: if you deny representation to the obnoxious, you don’t get rid of them. You radicalize them, and you delegitimize the whole bargain that makes losing an election survivable.
Patten’s choice of “jerks” is doing strategic work. It’s blunt, faintly comic, and deliberately non-technical - a politician reaching for the language of everyday irritation instead of constitutional theology. That plainness smuggles in a hard idea: democratic legitimacy depends on including the objectionable, not just tolerating them. If democracy only represents the reasonable, it quickly becomes an instrument for the reasonable to rule, which is how democracies slide into technocracy, paternalism, or moral gatekeeping.
The subtext is aimed at a recurring temptation in liberal politics: to treat certain voters as a mistake that the system should correct rather than a constituency the system must absorb. In moments of polarization - populist surges, culture-war elections, the rise of conspiracy-inflected parties - “the jerks” become a shorthand for the people whose presence feels like sabotage. Patten flips the frame. Their representation isn’t a bug; it’s the democratic stress test.
There’s also an implied warning to elites: if you deny representation to the obnoxious, you don’t get rid of them. You radicalize them, and you delegitimize the whole bargain that makes losing an election survivable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Chris
Add to List



