"In addition, we were unable to meet openly to discuss the progress of the book, for we were both on the list of persons banned from communicating with other banned persons"
About this Quote
The specific intent is documentary, almost procedural: to record how repression doesn’t only silence ideas, it obstructs the mundane mechanics of collaboration. A book is a collective act - drafts passed, arguments tested, trust built. By banning “communicating with other banned persons,” the state targets the social infrastructure that makes dissent durable. It’s not enough to isolate activists from the public; you isolate them from each other, then call it law.
Subtextually, the phrase “meet openly” bristles. It implies a life conducted in shadows, where ordinary intellectual work becomes suspect, where even conversation is contraband. And the repetition of “banned” carries a numbingly repetitive rhythm, mimicking the way authoritarian systems turn identity into a category: not writer, not colleague, not friend - banned person.
Context matters: First wrote from the lived reality of apartheid-era South Africa’s banning orders, which restricted movement, association, and speech, often without trial. The line captures a regime confident enough to fear a manuscript, and sophisticated enough to understand that ideas spread less through speeches than through networks. The book’s “progress” becomes a measure of resistance, and the state’s obsession with blocking it reveals its own insecurity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Verified source: South Africa: The Peasants' Revolt (Ruth First, 1964)
Evidence:
In addition, we were unable to meet openly to discuss the progress of the book, for we were both on the list of persons banned from communicating with other banned persons. (Preface (by Ruth First) , exact page number not verified from scan). This sentence appears in the Preface written by Ruth First for Govan Mbeki’s book. The Preface is dated "London, June 1964" in a reprint of the preface text, consistent with the book’s original publication year (1964) in Penguin’s African Library series. The quote is therefore a primary-source statement by Ruth First first published in the 1964 book’s preface (not a later quotes website). |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
First, Ruth. (2026, February 21). In addition, we were unable to meet openly to discuss the progress of the book, for we were both on the list of persons banned from communicating with other banned persons. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-addition-we-were-unable-to-meet-openly-to-134652/
Chicago Style
First, Ruth. "In addition, we were unable to meet openly to discuss the progress of the book, for we were both on the list of persons banned from communicating with other banned persons." FixQuotes. February 21, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-addition-we-were-unable-to-meet-openly-to-134652/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"In addition, we were unable to meet openly to discuss the progress of the book, for we were both on the list of persons banned from communicating with other banned persons." FixQuotes, 21 Feb. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-addition-we-were-unable-to-meet-openly-to-134652/. Accessed 5 Mar. 2026.





