"In America the majority raises formidable barriers around the liberty of opinion; within these barriers an author may write what he pleases, but woe to him if he goes beyond them"
About this Quote
Democracy’s great trick is making coercion feel like consensus. Tocqueville’s line lands because it refuses the comforting story that freedom of speech is secured once the state backs off. The “formidable barriers” aren’t prisons or censorship bureaus; they’re social architecture. The majority doesn’t need to gag you when it can isolate you, brand you as unserious or immoral, and make your livelihood contingent on staying inside the approved perimeter.
The phrase “an author may write what he pleases” is bait: it sketches a zone of apparent liberty, then snaps shut with “woe to him.” Tocqueville is diagnosing a soft form of punishment that’s especially potent in a young, status-conscious republic where public opinion is a currency. This is less about legality than about belonging. When the crowd becomes the arbiter of virtue, dissent starts to look like deviance, and the fear isn’t arrest but social death: the lost audience, the soured reputation, the quiet closing of doors.
Context matters. Writing in the 1830s after traveling the United States, Tocqueville admired American self-government but worried about “the tyranny of the majority,” a phenomenon he thought could flatten individuality and stunt intellectual risk-taking. His historian’s eye catches an irony: a society founded on liberty can still build invisible fences around thought, because mass opinion is itself a governing force. The warning remains sharp because it treats free expression not as a right you possess, but as a climate you have to survive.
The phrase “an author may write what he pleases” is bait: it sketches a zone of apparent liberty, then snaps shut with “woe to him.” Tocqueville is diagnosing a soft form of punishment that’s especially potent in a young, status-conscious republic where public opinion is a currency. This is less about legality than about belonging. When the crowd becomes the arbiter of virtue, dissent starts to look like deviance, and the fear isn’t arrest but social death: the lost audience, the soured reputation, the quiet closing of doors.
Context matters. Writing in the 1830s after traveling the United States, Tocqueville admired American self-government but worried about “the tyranny of the majority,” a phenomenon he thought could flatten individuality and stunt intellectual risk-taking. His historian’s eye catches an irony: a society founded on liberty can still build invisible fences around thought, because mass opinion is itself a governing force. The warning remains sharp because it treats free expression not as a right you possess, but as a climate you have to survive.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (originally 1835/1840). English translation — passage on the majority's power over opinion. (Commonly rendered in translations as the quoted line.) |
More Quotes by Alexis
Add to List
