"In Egypt today most people are concerned with getting bread to eat. Only some of the educated understand how democracy works"
About this Quote
Mahfouz lands the line like a quiet indictment: democracy is a luxury item in a country where the daily headline is still the price of bread. The genius is the compression. “Bread” isn’t just food; in Egyptian political memory it’s a trigger word, shorthand for the social contract and for what happens when it breaks. When survival becomes the full-time job, civic participation turns into a distant language - something discussed in salons while queues form outside bakeries.
The sting is in “Only some of the educated.” Mahfouz isn’t flattering the intelligentsia; he’s exposing a brittle, inherited divide. Education here reads less like enlightenment than a gated passport into abstract systems. That tension runs through his fiction: the street-level realism of Cairo’s alleys rubbing against grand ideologies imported, translated, and rarely metabolized by the majority. He implies that “understanding how democracy works” is not merely a matter of literacy or curriculum, but of conditions that make long-term thinking possible.
Context matters: Mahfouz wrote across monarchy, revolution, nationalism, and authoritarian stability. That long view makes him suspicious of slogans. He’s pointing at the political problem beneath the political debate: institutions can’t compete with hunger. The subtext is sobering and slightly accusatory - not toward “the people” for being apolitical, but toward any leadership or elite discourse that treats democratic practice as a moral failing rather than an economic and social outcome.
The sting is in “Only some of the educated.” Mahfouz isn’t flattering the intelligentsia; he’s exposing a brittle, inherited divide. Education here reads less like enlightenment than a gated passport into abstract systems. That tension runs through his fiction: the street-level realism of Cairo’s alleys rubbing against grand ideologies imported, translated, and rarely metabolized by the majority. He implies that “understanding how democracy works” is not merely a matter of literacy or curriculum, but of conditions that make long-term thinking possible.
Context matters: Mahfouz wrote across monarchy, revolution, nationalism, and authoritarian stability. That long view makes him suspicious of slogans. He’s pointing at the political problem beneath the political debate: institutions can’t compete with hunger. The subtext is sobering and slightly accusatory - not toward “the people” for being apolitical, but toward any leadership or elite discourse that treats democratic practice as a moral failing rather than an economic and social outcome.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Naguib
Add to List



