"In emerging democracies like Russia, in authoritarian states like Iran or even Yugoslavia, journalists play a vital role in civil society. In fact, they form the very basis of those new democracies and civil societies"
About this Quote
Amanpour isn’t praising journalism as a noble craft so much as framing it as political infrastructure. In places where courts are pliable, parties are hollow, and public trust is routinely looted, the press isn’t a “watchdog” on the sidelines; it’s the scaffolding that lets civil society exist in public at all. Her blunt escalation - “vital role” to “the very basis” - is deliberate. It smuggles in an argument Western audiences often forget: democracy is not a switch you flip at an election; it’s a set of habits, norms, and channels for disagreement, and those channels have to be built before they can be protected.
The subtext is both flattering and chastening. Flattering, because it casts reporters as protagonists in the democratic story. Chastening, because it implies that without independent journalism, the rest of “civil society” becomes theater: NGOs without reach, opposition movements without amplification, citizens without a shared set of facts sturdy enough to argue over. Her examples are a map of post-Cold War optimism and its hangover - Russia’s “emerging” promise, Iran’s hardened authoritarianism, Yugoslavia’s fragmentation - reminding us that information vacuums get filled fast by nationalism, propaganda, and fear.
Contextually, this is the worldview of a war and foreign correspondent who watched regimes fall and new ones calcify. The intent is advocacy disguised as description: treat journalists not as neutral commentators but as a frontline institution, and understand that attacking them is not a side effect of authoritarianism; it’s one of its opening moves.
The subtext is both flattering and chastening. Flattering, because it casts reporters as protagonists in the democratic story. Chastening, because it implies that without independent journalism, the rest of “civil society” becomes theater: NGOs without reach, opposition movements without amplification, citizens without a shared set of facts sturdy enough to argue over. Her examples are a map of post-Cold War optimism and its hangover - Russia’s “emerging” promise, Iran’s hardened authoritarianism, Yugoslavia’s fragmentation - reminding us that information vacuums get filled fast by nationalism, propaganda, and fear.
Contextually, this is the worldview of a war and foreign correspondent who watched regimes fall and new ones calcify. The intent is advocacy disguised as description: treat journalists not as neutral commentators but as a frontline institution, and understand that attacking them is not a side effect of authoritarianism; it’s one of its opening moves.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Christiane
Add to List





