"In England, literary pretence is more universal than elsewhere, from our method of education"
About this Quote
The key move is blame-shifting: not to individual snobs, but to “our method of education.” That phrase drags pretension out of the drawing room and into the classroom. Victorian schooling, especially for the aspiring middle class, trained students to revere canonical authors, memorize, paraphrase, and signal refinement. It rewarded the appearance of taste as much as taste itself. Payn is suggesting that when education becomes a system for manufacturing “cultured” citizens, it also mass-produces people who can talk like they’ve read what they haven’t, or who read to be seen reading.
As a novelist and editor working inside the literary marketplace, Payn would have recognized the economics behind the posture: prestige sells. Publishers, reviewers, and polite society all benefit when literature is treated as a gatekeeping device. The subtext is quietly democratic and quietly ruthless: if pretence is universal, it’s not an elite flaw but a national technique, a country teaching its citizens to confuse intellectual life with intellectual display.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Payn, James. (2026, February 16). In England, literary pretence is more universal than elsewhere, from our method of education. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-england-literary-pretence-is-more-universal-142848/
Chicago Style
Payn, James. "In England, literary pretence is more universal than elsewhere, from our method of education." FixQuotes. February 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-england-literary-pretence-is-more-universal-142848/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"In England, literary pretence is more universal than elsewhere, from our method of education." FixQuotes, 16 Feb. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-england-literary-pretence-is-more-universal-142848/. Accessed 22 Feb. 2026.





