"In England we have come to rely upon a comfortable time-lag of fifty years or a century intervening between the perception that something ought to be done and a serious attempt to do it"
About this Quote
A nation that prides itself on commonsense is, in Wells's telling, quietly addicted to procrastination. The line lands because it dresses a civic vice in the cozy clothes of tradition: not delay, but a "comfortable time-lag", as if institutional inertia were a favorite armchair. Wells, the futurist who spent his career warning that history does not wait for polite consensus, skewers England's habit of treating reform as an intergenerational relay race. Everyone agrees something must be done; the doing is deferred until the urgency has cooled into etiquette.
The wit is in the calibration. "Fifty years or a century" isn't hyperbole so much as a cruel measurement of how long a system can absorb moral pressure without changing its shape. Wells implies a politics built to outlast indignation: commissions, debates, and incrementalism that convert crises into paperwork. The subtext is that delay is not neutral. Time benefits the status quo, and the people harmed by existing arrangements are asked to subsidize patience with their lives.
Context matters: Wells wrote in an era when Britain faced accelerating industrial change, imperial strain, and the looming catastrophe of modern war. He watched scientific and technological progress sprint ahead while governance ambled behind, clinging to precedent as proof of virtue. The sentence reads like a diagnosis of a ruling class that confuses caution with wisdom and calls its own fear of disruption "stability". It's not just a complaint about slowness; it's an accusation that England has made lateness into a governing philosophy.
The wit is in the calibration. "Fifty years or a century" isn't hyperbole so much as a cruel measurement of how long a system can absorb moral pressure without changing its shape. Wells implies a politics built to outlast indignation: commissions, debates, and incrementalism that convert crises into paperwork. The subtext is that delay is not neutral. Time benefits the status quo, and the people harmed by existing arrangements are asked to subsidize patience with their lives.
Context matters: Wells wrote in an era when Britain faced accelerating industrial change, imperial strain, and the looming catastrophe of modern war. He watched scientific and technological progress sprint ahead while governance ambled behind, clinging to precedent as proof of virtue. The sentence reads like a diagnosis of a ruling class that confuses caution with wisdom and calls its own fear of disruption "stability". It's not just a complaint about slowness; it's an accusation that England has made lateness into a governing philosophy.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Wells
Add to List








