"In fact a lot of them I think are absolute baloney. Those Charles Olsens and people like that. At first I was interested in seeing what they were up to, what they were doing, why they were doing it. They never moved me in the way that one is moved by true poetry"
About this Quote
MacCaig’s dismissal lands with the bluntness of a man defending poetry’s right to be felt, not merely decoded. Calling certain contemporaries “absolute baloney” isn’t just cranky taste-making; it’s a deliberate puncture of mid-century avant-garde prestige, the kind that can turn difficulty into a badge of seriousness. His target (misnamed here but clearly gesturing at Charles Olson and the postwar experimental scene) stands for a poetry that often foregrounds method: projective breath, fractured syntax, intellectual scaffolding. MacCaig admits the respectable posture first: curiosity, openness, the good-faith desire to understand “what they were up to.” Then he withdraws the only credential he ultimately cares about: being moved.
That phrase “true poetry” is doing quiet polemical work. It suggests an ethical line, not just an aesthetic preference: the poem should earn its strangeness by enlarging perception, not by staging obscurity as virtue. MacCaig’s own writing, shaped by Scottish landscapes and a hard-won clarity, tends to distrust self-mythologizing literary movements. The subtext is that a poem can be innovative and still emotionally legible; innovation that bypasses the nerves becomes performance.
Context matters: postwar Britain watched American experimental currents arrive with institutional momentum, and the pressure to keep up could feel like a forced march. MacCaig’s refusal reads less as anti-modernist stubbornness than as a defense of a different modernism - one where precision, wit, and human charge outweigh theory.
That phrase “true poetry” is doing quiet polemical work. It suggests an ethical line, not just an aesthetic preference: the poem should earn its strangeness by enlarging perception, not by staging obscurity as virtue. MacCaig’s own writing, shaped by Scottish landscapes and a hard-won clarity, tends to distrust self-mythologizing literary movements. The subtext is that a poem can be innovative and still emotionally legible; innovation that bypasses the nerves becomes performance.
Context matters: postwar Britain watched American experimental currents arrive with institutional momentum, and the pressure to keep up could feel like a forced march. MacCaig’s refusal reads less as anti-modernist stubbornness than as a defense of a different modernism - one where precision, wit, and human charge outweigh theory.
Quote Details
| Topic | Poetry |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Norman
Add to List

