"In fact, I don't read newspapers any longer"
About this Quote
Naomi Campbell’s “In fact, I don’t read newspapers any longer” lands like a shrug with a paper cut. Coming from a model who spent decades as tabloid prey and fashion-world spectacle, it’s not an anti-intellectual confession so much as a boundary-setting tactic: opting out of a medium that often treats her less as a person than as clickable material.
The phrase “In fact” is the tell. It signals she’s correcting an assumption, as if someone has accused her of keeping up, staying informed, reading the write-ups. She counters with a clean refusal. “Any longer” does the heavier work: she used to. She learned the system, lived inside it, then decided the cost outweighed the benefit. That small time marker turns the line from laziness into strategy, a conscious withdrawal rather than mere disinterest.
Context matters because newspapers, for celebrities of Campbell’s era, were not neutral sources; they were surveillance instruments with a paycheck attached. The subtext is self-preservation in an attention economy that punishes you twice: once in print, then again in the commentariat. Her statement also anticipates a broader cultural shift where “staying informed” increasingly feels like participating in a machine designed to agitate and monetize anxiety. Coming from someone whose image has been both currency and cudgel, the line reads as a refusal to keep feeding a narrative that rarely serves her. It’s minimal, almost bored, and that’s the point: star power as quiet disengagement.
The phrase “In fact” is the tell. It signals she’s correcting an assumption, as if someone has accused her of keeping up, staying informed, reading the write-ups. She counters with a clean refusal. “Any longer” does the heavier work: she used to. She learned the system, lived inside it, then decided the cost outweighed the benefit. That small time marker turns the line from laziness into strategy, a conscious withdrawal rather than mere disinterest.
Context matters because newspapers, for celebrities of Campbell’s era, were not neutral sources; they were surveillance instruments with a paycheck attached. The subtext is self-preservation in an attention economy that punishes you twice: once in print, then again in the commentariat. Her statement also anticipates a broader cultural shift where “staying informed” increasingly feels like participating in a machine designed to agitate and monetize anxiety. Coming from someone whose image has been both currency and cudgel, the line reads as a refusal to keep feeding a narrative that rarely serves her. It’s minimal, almost bored, and that’s the point: star power as quiet disengagement.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Naomi
Add to List





