"In genetic epistemology, as in developmental psychology, too, there is never an absolute beginning"
About this Quote
Piaget’s line quietly refuses the comfort of origin stories. “There is never an absolute beginning” is a methodological warning disguised as a simple observation: if you’re trying to explain knowledge (genetic epistemology) or mind (developmental psychology) by pointing to a single starting gun, you’ve already flattened the phenomenon.
The intent is surgical. Piaget is pushing back against any model that treats cognition like a machine you switch on at birth or at the first recognizable “stage.” Development, in his framework, is iterative construction: the child is always arriving with prior organization, even if that organization is rudimentary. The mind doesn’t emerge from zero; it reorganizes itself through continuous exchanges with the world. That’s why “beginning” becomes a misleading concept. The moment you name one, you ignore the earlier conditions that made it possible.
Subtextually, Piaget is also fencing with philosophical epistemology. Traditional theories love clean foundations: innate ideas vs. blank slate, a priori principles vs. sensory input. Piaget’s move is to dissolve the courtroom drama. Knowledge isn’t handed down by biology or donated by experience; it’s built through assimilation and accommodation, and that building process has no pristine first brick.
Context matters: mid-20th-century psychology was hungry for firm baselines - standardized tests, fixed capacities, measurable onsets. Piaget answers with a more inconvenient truth: development is a history, not a snapshot. The quote works because it doesn’t merely complicate childhood; it challenges how modern science narrates causality itself, urging us to trade beginnings for continuities and neat explanations for living processes.
The intent is surgical. Piaget is pushing back against any model that treats cognition like a machine you switch on at birth or at the first recognizable “stage.” Development, in his framework, is iterative construction: the child is always arriving with prior organization, even if that organization is rudimentary. The mind doesn’t emerge from zero; it reorganizes itself through continuous exchanges with the world. That’s why “beginning” becomes a misleading concept. The moment you name one, you ignore the earlier conditions that made it possible.
Subtextually, Piaget is also fencing with philosophical epistemology. Traditional theories love clean foundations: innate ideas vs. blank slate, a priori principles vs. sensory input. Piaget’s move is to dissolve the courtroom drama. Knowledge isn’t handed down by biology or donated by experience; it’s built through assimilation and accommodation, and that building process has no pristine first brick.
Context matters: mid-20th-century psychology was hungry for firm baselines - standardized tests, fixed capacities, measurable onsets. Piaget answers with a more inconvenient truth: development is a history, not a snapshot. The quote works because it doesn’t merely complicate childhood; it challenges how modern science narrates causality itself, urging us to trade beginnings for continuities and neat explanations for living processes.
Quote Details
| Topic | Knowledge |
|---|
More Quotes by Jean
Add to List
