"In his years in Washington, Senator Kerry has been one vote of a hundred in the United States Senate - and fortunately on matters of national security he was very often in the minority"
About this Quote
Cheney’s line works like a beltway magic trick: it shrinks John Kerry from a presidential contender into a faceless backbencher, then turns that smallness into a virtue only because Kerry allegedly used it badly. “One vote of a hundred” isn’t just arithmetic; it’s a demotion. It frames Kerry’s Senate record as indistinguishable, bureaucratic, and therefore unworthy of executive power. The jab lands because it exploits a familiar American suspicion that long tenure in Washington equals dilution of conviction.
The second clause is the real payload. “Fortunately” signals that Kerry’s influence was limited, but it also implies that Kerry’s judgment was actively dangerous. Cheney isn’t merely saying Kerry was wrong; he’s saying the country was spared by institutional friction and by Kerry’s marginality. That’s an attack on competence disguised as an attack on ideology.
Context matters: this is post-9/11 political language, when “national security” functioned as both policy domain and moral sorting hat. Cheney, the public face of the Bush administration’s hawkish posture, positions himself as guardian of seriousness. By praising “the minority” status on security votes, he flips a normally admirable trait (independence, dissent) into negligence or weakness. The subtext is clear: Kerry’s caution is not prudence but unreliability.
It’s also a preemptive narrative weapon. If Kerry points to Senate experience, Cheney counters: experience doesn’t equal leadership; it equals being outvoted. If Kerry argues for restraint, Cheney frames restraint as a luxury America can’t afford. The sentence is built to make the safest place for Kerry’s ideas the losing column.
The second clause is the real payload. “Fortunately” signals that Kerry’s influence was limited, but it also implies that Kerry’s judgment was actively dangerous. Cheney isn’t merely saying Kerry was wrong; he’s saying the country was spared by institutional friction and by Kerry’s marginality. That’s an attack on competence disguised as an attack on ideology.
Context matters: this is post-9/11 political language, when “national security” functioned as both policy domain and moral sorting hat. Cheney, the public face of the Bush administration’s hawkish posture, positions himself as guardian of seriousness. By praising “the minority” status on security votes, he flips a normally admirable trait (independence, dissent) into negligence or weakness. The subtext is clear: Kerry’s caution is not prudence but unreliability.
It’s also a preemptive narrative weapon. If Kerry points to Senate experience, Cheney counters: experience doesn’t equal leadership; it equals being outvoted. If Kerry argues for restraint, Cheney frames restraint as a luxury America can’t afford. The sentence is built to make the safest place for Kerry’s ideas the losing column.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Dick
Add to List




