"In matters of truth and justice, there is no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same"
About this Quote
Einstein’s line reads like a moral law of physics: scale doesn’t change the underlying principle. Coming from the century’s most famous theorist of relativity, it’s a pointed pivot to moral absolutism. In science, Einstein showed that measurements depend on frames of reference; in ethics, he’s insisting there are things that don’t. Truth and justice aren’t elastic. The cleverness is in the inversion: the man associated with “everything is relative” argues that human treatment is precisely where relativism becomes an alibi.
The intent is disciplinary. He’s warning against the common bureaucratic dodge that small harms are “minor,” too trivial for accountability. Institutions love that move because it turns cruelty into paperwork: a denied visa, a humiliating policy, a casual slur, an unfair dismissal. Each can be defended as a small exception, an edge case, an unfortunate necessity. Einstein rejects the idea that accumulating “little” injustices somehow adds up to neutrality. The subtext is that moral attention is itself a test of character and society: if you can only recognize injustice when it arrives as catastrophe, you’re not committed to justice; you’re committed to spectacle.
Context matters: Einstein was not just a scientist but a public intellectual shaped by two world wars, rising fascism, antisemitism, and state violence rationalized as administrative necessity. His sentence is an anti-excuse machine, aimed at the everyday complicity that makes larger crimes possible. It’s also a challenge to the reader’s moral math: stop calculating whether a harm is big enough to “count.” If it involves people, it already does.
The intent is disciplinary. He’s warning against the common bureaucratic dodge that small harms are “minor,” too trivial for accountability. Institutions love that move because it turns cruelty into paperwork: a denied visa, a humiliating policy, a casual slur, an unfair dismissal. Each can be defended as a small exception, an edge case, an unfortunate necessity. Einstein rejects the idea that accumulating “little” injustices somehow adds up to neutrality. The subtext is that moral attention is itself a test of character and society: if you can only recognize injustice when it arrives as catastrophe, you’re not committed to justice; you’re committed to spectacle.
Context matters: Einstein was not just a scientist but a public intellectual shaped by two world wars, rising fascism, antisemitism, and state violence rationalized as administrative necessity. His sentence is an anti-excuse machine, aimed at the everyday complicity that makes larger crimes possible. It’s also a challenge to the reader’s moral math: stop calculating whether a harm is big enough to “count.” If it involves people, it already does.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Later attribution: Albert Einstein (Albert Einstein) modern compilation
Evidence:
rogram in matters concerning truth and justice there can be no distinction between big problems and small for the general principles which determine the conduct of men are indivisible who |
More Quotes by Albert
Add to List





