"In my book I specifically discussed the structural nature of injustice and offered Nine Touchstones of Goddess ethics as an alternative to the Ten Commandments of Biblical religion"
About this Quote
A quiet provocation is doing loud work here: Christ doesn’t merely propose a different moral list, she reframes the entire machinery of morality. By foregrounding “the structural nature of injustice,” she positions harm not as a series of individual sins but as baked into systems - law, family, economy, religion itself. That phrase signals an educator’s instinct to move the discussion from private conscience to public design: if injustice is structural, repentance alone won’t fix it; you need renovation.
Then comes the deliberate swap: “Nine Touchstones of Goddess ethics” against “the Ten Commandments of Biblical religion.” The move is rhetorical judo. The Ten Commandments function culturally as shorthand for moral authority, permanence, even civics. Christ challenges that monopoly by offering an alternative sacred framework, and the numbers matter: nine versus ten reads as a refusal to compete on the same scoreboard. She’s not trying to out-command the commandments; she’s proposing a different genre of ethics, one rooted in relationship, embodiment, and immanence rather than decree.
The subtext is feminist and post-patriarchal without needing to say so. “Biblical religion” is treated less as personal faith than as an institution historically aligned with hierarchy. “Goddess ethics” signals a counter-tradition that re-centers the divine as plural, female, and earth-connected - and, crucially, treats authority as something negotiated in community rather than handed down from a mountain.
Contextually, this sits in late-20th-century feminist theology’s project: not just critiquing sexism in religion, but building alternative moral infrastructures sturdy enough to live in.
Then comes the deliberate swap: “Nine Touchstones of Goddess ethics” against “the Ten Commandments of Biblical religion.” The move is rhetorical judo. The Ten Commandments function culturally as shorthand for moral authority, permanence, even civics. Christ challenges that monopoly by offering an alternative sacred framework, and the numbers matter: nine versus ten reads as a refusal to compete on the same scoreboard. She’s not trying to out-command the commandments; she’s proposing a different genre of ethics, one rooted in relationship, embodiment, and immanence rather than decree.
The subtext is feminist and post-patriarchal without needing to say so. “Biblical religion” is treated less as personal faith than as an institution historically aligned with hierarchy. “Goddess ethics” signals a counter-tradition that re-centers the divine as plural, female, and earth-connected - and, crucially, treats authority as something negotiated in community rather than handed down from a mountain.
Contextually, this sits in late-20th-century feminist theology’s project: not just critiquing sexism in religion, but building alternative moral infrastructures sturdy enough to live in.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Carol
Add to List







