"In my case, I used the elements of these simple forms - square, cube, line and color - to produce logical systems. Most of these systems were finite; that is, they were complete using all possible variations. This kept them simple"
About this Quote
LeWitt makes austerity sound like a form of generosity. By limiting himself to "square, cube, line and color", he isn’t shrinking art down to a cold toolkit; he’s engineering a situation where the viewer can see thinking itself. The hook is the word "logical" - a term that drags Minimalism away from vibe and into procedure. He’s not confessing taste so much as describing a machine he built to outsmart taste.
The key move is his insistence that the systems are "finite" and "complete". That’s a quiet flex: completion implies authority, like a proof that can’t be argued with. But it’s also a way to dodge the romantic myth of the artist as a fountain of endless inspiration. If all "possible variations" are accounted for, the artist becomes a designer of rules, not a virtuoso of decisions. Constraint isn’t an obstacle; it’s the method for producing clarity, repeatability, and, crucially, accountability. You can test the work against its own premise.
Context matters: LeWitt is writing from the conceptual turn of the 1960s and after, when the idea could be the artwork and fabrication could be delegated. His finite systems parallel the era’s fascination with grids, seriality, and information - the same cultural logic that was reorganizing everything from urban planning to computing. "This kept them simple" lands as both defense and provocation: simple doesn’t mean easy. It means stripped of mystique, leaving you face-to-face with structure, choice, and the pleasure (or unease) of a world where the rules are visible.
The key move is his insistence that the systems are "finite" and "complete". That’s a quiet flex: completion implies authority, like a proof that can’t be argued with. But it’s also a way to dodge the romantic myth of the artist as a fountain of endless inspiration. If all "possible variations" are accounted for, the artist becomes a designer of rules, not a virtuoso of decisions. Constraint isn’t an obstacle; it’s the method for producing clarity, repeatability, and, crucially, accountability. You can test the work against its own premise.
Context matters: LeWitt is writing from the conceptual turn of the 1960s and after, when the idea could be the artwork and fabrication could be delegated. His finite systems parallel the era’s fascination with grids, seriality, and information - the same cultural logic that was reorganizing everything from urban planning to computing. "This kept them simple" lands as both defense and provocation: simple doesn’t mean easy. It means stripped of mystique, leaving you face-to-face with structure, choice, and the pleasure (or unease) of a world where the rules are visible.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Sol
Add to List
