"In my experience a painting is not made with colors and paint at all. I don't know what a painting is; who knows what sets off even the desire to paint?"
About this Quote
Guston treats the studio like a crime scene where the obvious evidence (pigment, brushwork, “skill”) can’t explain the motive. By flatly denying that painting is made with colors and paint, he’s not romanticizing the medium so much as stripping it of its alibis. The line lands as a provocation against the tidy myths art culture loves: mastery, intention, the notion that a painting is a controlled delivery of meaning from artist to viewer. For Guston, the materials are almost incidental; what matters is the pressure behind the act, the internal weather that makes a person pick up a brush in the first place.
That second sentence is the tell. “I don’t know what a painting is” isn’t false modesty; it’s an ethic. It positions uncertainty as the engine of form, not a flaw to be corrected. The question “who knows what sets off even the desire to paint?” nudges the conversation away from aesthetics toward psychology, compulsion, and history. Guston lived through modernism’s mid-century confidence and then famously detonated his own reputation by pivoting from abstract expressionism to raw, cartoonish figuration in the late 1960s. Read in that context, the quote sounds like a man refusing the period’s orthodoxies: the idea that abstraction was the “truth” of painting, or that progress meant purification.
The subtext is bracingly anti-credential. Painting isn’t a product you assemble from proper ingredients; it’s a strange necessity, triggered by forces you can’t fully name, and maybe shouldn’t. Guston makes ignorance sound less like a gap and more like the only honest starting point.
That second sentence is the tell. “I don’t know what a painting is” isn’t false modesty; it’s an ethic. It positions uncertainty as the engine of form, not a flaw to be corrected. The question “who knows what sets off even the desire to paint?” nudges the conversation away from aesthetics toward psychology, compulsion, and history. Guston lived through modernism’s mid-century confidence and then famously detonated his own reputation by pivoting from abstract expressionism to raw, cartoonish figuration in the late 1960s. Read in that context, the quote sounds like a man refusing the period’s orthodoxies: the idea that abstraction was the “truth” of painting, or that progress meant purification.
The subtext is bracingly anti-credential. Painting isn’t a product you assemble from proper ingredients; it’s a strange necessity, triggered by forces you can’t fully name, and maybe shouldn’t. Guston makes ignorance sound less like a gap and more like the only honest starting point.
Quote Details
| Topic | Art |
|---|
More Quotes by Philip
Add to List
