"In my view, there is an urgent need to communicate with the public and help to explain where there is consensus, and where are there doubts about the issues of sustainable development"
About this Quote
Urgency is doing a lot of quiet work here. Sachs isn’t just calling for “better messaging” on sustainable development; he’s trying to reclaim the terms of public debate from a media ecosystem that treats scientific and policy questions like partisan blood sports. By insisting on “communicate with the public,” he positions expertise as a civic obligation, not an ivory-tower perk. The implied villain isn’t ignorance so much as the information market: the incentives that turn complexity into clickbait, and uncertainty into a weapon.
The line’s smartest move is its split-screen framing: “where there is consensus, and where are there doubts.” That’s a preemptive strike against two opposing failures. One is overconfidence: selling sustainability as settled doctrine, which invites backlash the moment tradeoffs surface (jobs vs. emissions, growth vs. limits). The other is bad-faith skepticism: the familiar tactic of laundering delay through “just asking questions,” as if every established finding is up for referendum. Sachs wants a taxonomy of certainty, a way to say, plainly, “Here’s what we know, here’s what we’re still testing, and here’s what policy can do in the meantime.”
Context matters: Sachs has spent decades at the intersection of development economics, global institutions, and climate policy, where the technical details are inseparable from geopolitics and money. “Help to explain” reads like humility, but it’s also a bid for authority: not to dictate values, but to discipline the conversation so that disagreement happens on honest terrain.
The line’s smartest move is its split-screen framing: “where there is consensus, and where are there doubts.” That’s a preemptive strike against two opposing failures. One is overconfidence: selling sustainability as settled doctrine, which invites backlash the moment tradeoffs surface (jobs vs. emissions, growth vs. limits). The other is bad-faith skepticism: the familiar tactic of laundering delay through “just asking questions,” as if every established finding is up for referendum. Sachs wants a taxonomy of certainty, a way to say, plainly, “Here’s what we know, here’s what we’re still testing, and here’s what policy can do in the meantime.”
Context matters: Sachs has spent decades at the intersection of development economics, global institutions, and climate policy, where the technical details are inseparable from geopolitics and money. “Help to explain” reads like humility, but it’s also a bid for authority: not to dictate values, but to discipline the conversation so that disagreement happens on honest terrain.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jeffrey
Add to List
