"In nature, the emphasis is in what is rather than what ought to be"
About this Quote
The intent is partly polemical. Smith is pushing back against the habit of reading “ought” into the natural world, whether that’s sentimentalizing it as inherently harmonious or weaponizing it as a moral alibi (“it’s natural, so it’s good”). By insisting on “what is,” he denies nature the role of ethical referee. Predation happens. Disease happens. Indifference happens. Any moral order we claim to find there is more often projection than discovery.
The subtext is also a theological warning about category errors. In many religious traditions Smith studied, the moral horizon comes from revelation, cultivation, or transcendence - not from biology’s raw facts. You can learn humility from nature, even awe, but you can’t outsource justice to it.
Contextually, this reads as a late-20th-century response to both scientific reductionism and moralized environmental rhetoric. Smith threads a narrow path: respect nature’s truth without pretending it carries your values. Ethics begins precisely where “what is” stops being enough.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Smith, Huston. (2026, January 18). In nature, the emphasis is in what is rather than what ought to be. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-nature-the-emphasis-is-in-what-is-rather-than-9467/
Chicago Style
Smith, Huston. "In nature, the emphasis is in what is rather than what ought to be." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-nature-the-emphasis-is-in-what-is-rather-than-9467/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"In nature, the emphasis is in what is rather than what ought to be." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-nature-the-emphasis-is-in-what-is-rather-than-9467/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.











