"In order to have wisdom we must have ignorance"
About this Quote
Dreiser’s line cuts against the self-help fantasy of wisdom as a polished end state. He frames ignorance not as a stain to be scrubbed out, but as the necessary raw material for insight. It’s an almost mechanistic claim: no ignorance, no wisdom, because wisdom only exists in relation to what we don’t know. The subtext is quietly anti-pretension. Anyone who speaks as if they’ve arrived, Dreiser implies, has opted out of the very conditions that make wisdom possible: uncertainty, error, embarrassment, revision.
Coming from a novelist who made a career out of social determinism and unglamorous realism, the idea tracks. Dreiser’s world is full of people pushed around by forces they barely understand - money, desire, class, biology. “Ignorance” here isn’t just lack of schooling; it’s the human condition of acting on partial information while the system keeps its real rules hidden. Wisdom, then, isn’t omniscience. It’s the earned ability to see patterns in the mess, to name the pressures that shape choices, to hold two truths at once: that we are responsible, and that we are constrained.
The sentence also works because it refuses comfort. It suggests that the path to wisdom runs through not-knowing and being wrong, which is culturally inconvenient in any era that rewards confidence as a performance. Dreiser isn’t romanticizing ignorance; he’s warning that the refusal to admit it is the surest way to stay foolish.
Coming from a novelist who made a career out of social determinism and unglamorous realism, the idea tracks. Dreiser’s world is full of people pushed around by forces they barely understand - money, desire, class, biology. “Ignorance” here isn’t just lack of schooling; it’s the human condition of acting on partial information while the system keeps its real rules hidden. Wisdom, then, isn’t omniscience. It’s the earned ability to see patterns in the mess, to name the pressures that shape choices, to hold two truths at once: that we are responsible, and that we are constrained.
The sentence also works because it refuses comfort. It suggests that the path to wisdom runs through not-knowing and being wrong, which is culturally inconvenient in any era that rewards confidence as a performance. Dreiser isn’t romanticizing ignorance; he’s warning that the refusal to admit it is the surest way to stay foolish.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Theodore
Add to List











