"In order to spur economic growth we need to put the brakes on out of control spending, lower Ohioans tax burden and create a most efficient and effective government"
About this Quote
The sentence tries to do a neat political magic trick: sell acceleration through restraint. “Spur economic growth” sets the aspiration, but the engine of the argument is moral, not technical. “Put the brakes on out of control spending” isn’t a budget diagnosis so much as a character judgment, casting government as reckless and taxpayers as the responsible adults forced to grab the wheel.
Blackwell’s phrasing stacks familiar fiscal-conservative pillars into a single breathless chain: spend less, tax less, govern better. The key word is “need.” It doesn’t invite debate about tradeoffs; it frames austerity as a prerequisite for prosperity, not one option among many. “Lower Ohioans tax burden” works as cultural signaling as much as policy: it suggests taxes are a weight carried by ordinary people (not, say, a collective investment), and it recruits regional identity to make the promise feel intimate and homegrown. “Ohioans” is a small rhetorical move that localizes what is often an ideological template.
Then comes the clincher: “create a most efficient and effective government.” The superlative “most” functions like a loophole. It gestures toward competence and reform without specifying what gets cut, privatized, or reorganized. Efficiency is a crowd-pleaser because it sounds apolitical, yet it often smuggles in a very political agenda: shrinking the state, narrowing its obligations, and redefining success as cost reduction.
In the mid-2000s Ohio context - manufacturing stress, anxiety about jobs, and distrust of institutions - this is calibrated reassurance. It promises growth without pain, discipline without sacrifice, and a government that will somehow do less while delivering more.
Blackwell’s phrasing stacks familiar fiscal-conservative pillars into a single breathless chain: spend less, tax less, govern better. The key word is “need.” It doesn’t invite debate about tradeoffs; it frames austerity as a prerequisite for prosperity, not one option among many. “Lower Ohioans tax burden” works as cultural signaling as much as policy: it suggests taxes are a weight carried by ordinary people (not, say, a collective investment), and it recruits regional identity to make the promise feel intimate and homegrown. “Ohioans” is a small rhetorical move that localizes what is often an ideological template.
Then comes the clincher: “create a most efficient and effective government.” The superlative “most” functions like a loophole. It gestures toward competence and reform without specifying what gets cut, privatized, or reorganized. Efficiency is a crowd-pleaser because it sounds apolitical, yet it often smuggles in a very political agenda: shrinking the state, narrowing its obligations, and redefining success as cost reduction.
In the mid-2000s Ohio context - manufacturing stress, anxiety about jobs, and distrust of institutions - this is calibrated reassurance. It promises growth without pain, discipline without sacrifice, and a government that will somehow do less while delivering more.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kenneth
Add to List


