"In Oxford before the war, I had, with this interest in mind, written a short textbook entitled, An Introduction to Economic Analysis and Policy. It was now my intention to rewrite this work"
About this Quote
There is something almost disarmingly modest about Meade’s voice here: a man announcing, in the plainest administrative prose, that he plans to rewrite a textbook. The understatement is the point. Coming from an economist whose career straddled the catastrophe of World War II and the rebuilding that followed, the line reads like a quiet manifesto for a certain kind of expertise: policy as a craft you revise under pressure, not a doctrine you defend to the death.
“In Oxford before the war” does heavy lifting. Oxford signals elite formation and intellectual pedigree; “before the war” marks a world that was intellectually confident, institutionally stable, and about to be proved inadequate. The subtext is that economic analysis can’t stay a seminar-room exercise once history detonates. Meade isn’t reminiscing; he’s drawing a fault line between an earlier, more self-contained economics and a postwar moment where government planning, welfare states, full employment, and international coordination stopped being theoretical options and became existential requirements.
The phrase “with this interest in mind” hints at continuity - a sustained preoccupation - while “now my intention” pivots to urgency. Rewriting isn’t just updating a syllabus; it’s recalibrating a toolkit for a changed political economy. Even the title he cites, An Introduction to Economic Analysis and Policy, reveals his temperament: analysis yoked to policy, explanation fused with prescription. Meade’s restraint masks ambition: to make economics legible to decision-makers in a world where bad theory wasn’t merely wrong, it was dangerous.
“In Oxford before the war” does heavy lifting. Oxford signals elite formation and intellectual pedigree; “before the war” marks a world that was intellectually confident, institutionally stable, and about to be proved inadequate. The subtext is that economic analysis can’t stay a seminar-room exercise once history detonates. Meade isn’t reminiscing; he’s drawing a fault line between an earlier, more self-contained economics and a postwar moment where government planning, welfare states, full employment, and international coordination stopped being theoretical options and became existential requirements.
The phrase “with this interest in mind” hints at continuity - a sustained preoccupation - while “now my intention” pivots to urgency. Rewriting isn’t just updating a syllabus; it’s recalibrating a toolkit for a changed political economy. Even the title he cites, An Introduction to Economic Analysis and Policy, reveals his temperament: analysis yoked to policy, explanation fused with prescription. Meade’s restraint masks ambition: to make economics legible to decision-makers in a world where bad theory wasn’t merely wrong, it was dangerous.
Quote Details
| Topic | Book |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by James
Add to List


