"In politics there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers, and then there are those like John McCain who use their careers to promote change"
About this Quote
Palin’s line is a neat piece of campaign jujitsu: it turns the most shopworn word in modern politics, “change,” into a character test, then claims the moral high ground without having to specify a single policy. The sentence builds a simple binary - climbers versus servants - and slips John McCain into the flattering category by definition. “Use change to promote their careers” paints opponents as opportunists who treat reform like a brand strategy; “use their careers to promote change” recasts longevity, normally a liability in an anti-establishment moment, as proof of seriousness.
The subtext is where it does its real work. In 2008, Barack Obama owned “change” as a cultural mood and a campaign engine. Palin’s move is to concede the word but challenge its custody: you can chant “change,” she suggests, and still be fundamentally self-interested. That’s a classic rhetorical pivot for an insurgent running alongside a long-serving senator: she borrows the energy of disruption while insulating the ticket from the “more of the same” charge.
It also performs a kind of preemptive inoculation. McCain’s maverick reputation had frayed under partisan gravity; this line tries to reattach it by implying a lifetime of principled risk-taking. The vagueness is intentional. Specifics invite fact-checks; virtue is harder to litigate. The result is a compact argument that asks voters to judge authenticity over novelty, and to treat experience not as entitlement but as evidence of motive.
The subtext is where it does its real work. In 2008, Barack Obama owned “change” as a cultural mood and a campaign engine. Palin’s move is to concede the word but challenge its custody: you can chant “change,” she suggests, and still be fundamentally self-interested. That’s a classic rhetorical pivot for an insurgent running alongside a long-serving senator: she borrows the energy of disruption while insulating the ticket from the “more of the same” charge.
It also performs a kind of preemptive inoculation. McCain’s maverick reputation had frayed under partisan gravity; this line tries to reattach it by implying a lifetime of principled risk-taking. The vagueness is intentional. Specifics invite fact-checks; virtue is harder to litigate. The result is a compact argument that asks voters to judge authenticity over novelty, and to treat experience not as entitlement but as evidence of motive.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|
More Quotes by Sarah
Add to List







