"In responding to a terrorist attack, there are only two choices - take the fight to the enemy or wait until they hit you again. In my estimation, America chose the first"
About this Quote
Granger’s line doesn’t argue policy so much as collapse it into a moral reflex: you’re either hitting back or helpless. The rhetorical trick is the forced binary. By declaring “only two choices,” she deletes the messy middle where most counterterrorism actually lives - intelligence work, coalition-building, legal constraints, diplomacy, prevention, and the slow grind of domestic security. Complexity becomes hesitation; hesitation becomes cowardice.
“Take the fight to the enemy” is doing heavy lifting. It’s an action-movie phrase that flatters the listener with agency and grit, and it quietly pre-sanitizes whatever follows - preemption, overseas operations, expanded surveillance - as simply “taking the fight” somewhere else. The enemy is also conveniently abstract: not a named group with a geography and politics, but a shadow category that can stretch to fit new targets. That vagueness is a feature, not a bug, because it keeps the argument portable across wars, authorizations, and news cycles.
The second option - “wait until they hit you again” - is crafted as an accusation in advance. Who would choose to “wait”? It frames skepticism as complicity with risk, putting critics on the defensive before they speak. “In my estimation” adds a thin sheen of humility while functioning as a stamp of legitimacy: she’s not just venting, she’s adjudicating national character.
Placed in the post-9/11 political climate, the quote reads as a loyalty test disguised as strategy. It aims to make escalation feel like self-respect.
“Take the fight to the enemy” is doing heavy lifting. It’s an action-movie phrase that flatters the listener with agency and grit, and it quietly pre-sanitizes whatever follows - preemption, overseas operations, expanded surveillance - as simply “taking the fight” somewhere else. The enemy is also conveniently abstract: not a named group with a geography and politics, but a shadow category that can stretch to fit new targets. That vagueness is a feature, not a bug, because it keeps the argument portable across wars, authorizations, and news cycles.
The second option - “wait until they hit you again” - is crafted as an accusation in advance. Who would choose to “wait”? It frames skepticism as complicity with risk, putting critics on the defensive before they speak. “In my estimation” adds a thin sheen of humility while functioning as a stamp of legitimacy: she’s not just venting, she’s adjudicating national character.
Placed in the post-9/11 political climate, the quote reads as a loyalty test disguised as strategy. It aims to make escalation feel like self-respect.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Kay
Add to List
