"In science, we must be interested in things, not in persons"
About this Quote
The subtext gets sharper when you remember Curie's world. She worked in an era when scientific authority was tightly gatekept and women were treated as anomalies, muses, or scandals. Curie herself was repeatedly pulled into the "persons" arena: scrutinized for her marriage, her nationality, her grief, her private life. In that light, the quote reads like both aspiration and defense mechanism. If science can be made to care about "things" only, then the researcher can stop being on trial.
There's also an ethical edge: focusing on persons is how bias sneaks in wearing a lab coat. Hero worship turns errors into dogma; prejudice turns competence into "exception". Curie offers a bracingly modern standard: let the work speak, let results be replicable, let truth be indifferent to reputation. It's not naive about human behavior; it's an attempt to design a culture where human flaws do less damage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Curie, Marie. (2026, January 18). In science, we must be interested in things, not in persons. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-science-we-must-be-interested-in-things-not-in-14854/
Chicago Style
Curie, Marie. "In science, we must be interested in things, not in persons." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-science-we-must-be-interested-in-things-not-in-14854/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"In science, we must be interested in things, not in persons." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-science-we-must-be-interested-in-things-not-in-14854/. Accessed 22 Feb. 2026.






