"In short, industrialism is over"
About this Quote
A line this blunt is a provocation disguised as a verdict. When Paul Hawken says, "In short, industrialism is over", he is not declaring that factories have vanished or that supply chains have politely dissolved. He is tightening the frame: the story we have told ourselves since the 19th century - that progress is synonymous with extraction, scale, and endless throughput - has run out of credibility, and soon, out of room.
The intent is strategic. "In short" performs impatience with debate, like a climate-era mic drop aimed at boardrooms and policymakers still bargaining with physics. Hawken’s subtext is that the old industrial bargain (growth now, cleanup later) has expired. Industrialism isn’t just an economic system here; it’s a worldview that treats nature as inventory and waste as an externality. Calling it "over" is a way to make denial sound outdated, even embarrassing - the rhetorical equivalent of telling someone they are arguing for dial-up.
Context matters because Hawken speaks from the cleantech and regeneration tradition: not apocalyptic collapse, but a pivot. This phrasing compresses a huge shift in moral accounting. If industrialism is over, then "business as usual" stops being neutral and becomes negligent. The line also smuggles in a challenge: if the old operating system is finished, what replaces it - regenerative design, circular economies, distributed energy - isn’t a niche preference. It’s the next default.
The power of the quote is its audacity: it treats the industrial era not as destiny, but as a phase we can outgrow, if we decide to.
The intent is strategic. "In short" performs impatience with debate, like a climate-era mic drop aimed at boardrooms and policymakers still bargaining with physics. Hawken’s subtext is that the old industrial bargain (growth now, cleanup later) has expired. Industrialism isn’t just an economic system here; it’s a worldview that treats nature as inventory and waste as an externality. Calling it "over" is a way to make denial sound outdated, even embarrassing - the rhetorical equivalent of telling someone they are arguing for dial-up.
Context matters because Hawken speaks from the cleantech and regeneration tradition: not apocalyptic collapse, but a pivot. This phrasing compresses a huge shift in moral accounting. If industrialism is over, then "business as usual" stops being neutral and becomes negligent. The line also smuggles in a challenge: if the old operating system is finished, what replaces it - regenerative design, circular economies, distributed energy - isn’t a niche preference. It’s the next default.
The power of the quote is its audacity: it treats the industrial era not as destiny, but as a phase we can outgrow, if we decide to.
Quote Details
| Topic | Change |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List



