"In short, the time has come for us as American and Iranian citizens to apply our mutual energy, intellect, and goodwill toward strengthening relations between our two countries, as their destinies are intertwined"
About this Quote
Vance’s line is diplomacy doing what it does best: turning hard power into a moral schedule. “In short” performs impatience with the stalemate, a way of saying the arguments have been exhausted and the only respectable move left is action. He pointedly recruits “American and Iranian citizens,” not just officials, smuggling in a liberal assumption that public sentiment and civil society can soften what governments calcify. It’s also a subtle rebuke to leaders on both sides: if citizens can muster “goodwill,” why can’t you?
The phrase “mutual energy, intellect, and goodwill” is strategic flattery with a purpose. It assigns parity to two countries that, in the late-20th-century U.S. imagination, were often cast in a hierarchy: modernizer versus problem. Vance insists on symmetry because symmetry is the first condition of negotiation. Nothing unlocks a relationship like letting the other side keep its dignity.
“Strengthening relations” is classic Vance-era understatement. It avoids naming land mines - the 1953 coup, the Shah, oil, revolution, hostages - while still gesturing toward a future in which those facts don’t have veto power. Then comes the pressure point: “their destinies are intertwined.” That’s not sentiment; it’s a geopolitical argument dressed as inevitability. Interdependence becomes the moral alibi for engagement: you can’t afford the romance of permanent estrangement when the region’s security, energy flows, and domestic politics ricochet across borders.
The subtext is a warning against performative hostility. If destiny is shared, spite is self-harm, and diplomacy becomes not idealism but maintenance.
The phrase “mutual energy, intellect, and goodwill” is strategic flattery with a purpose. It assigns parity to two countries that, in the late-20th-century U.S. imagination, were often cast in a hierarchy: modernizer versus problem. Vance insists on symmetry because symmetry is the first condition of negotiation. Nothing unlocks a relationship like letting the other side keep its dignity.
“Strengthening relations” is classic Vance-era understatement. It avoids naming land mines - the 1953 coup, the Shah, oil, revolution, hostages - while still gesturing toward a future in which those facts don’t have veto power. Then comes the pressure point: “their destinies are intertwined.” That’s not sentiment; it’s a geopolitical argument dressed as inevitability. Interdependence becomes the moral alibi for engagement: you can’t afford the romance of permanent estrangement when the region’s security, energy flows, and domestic politics ricochet across borders.
The subtext is a warning against performative hostility. If destiny is shared, spite is self-harm, and diplomacy becomes not idealism but maintenance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Cyrus
Add to List
