"In some cases, inventions prohibit innovation because we're so caught up in playing with the technology, we forget about the fact that it was supposed to be important"
About this Quote
Dean Kamen draws a sharp line between invention and innovation. An invention is a new thing; innovation is the messy, human work of turning that thing into value in the world. The danger he names is the seduction of the gadget itself. Demos dazzle, prototypes entertain, and teams can get trapped in an endless loop of tweaking features and benchmarks while losing sight of the problem the technology was meant to solve.
This can happen through simple attention capture. The immediate rewards lie in speed, specs, and cleverness; the harder tasks are integration, adoption, behavior change, policy, and business models. Money, talent, and time pile into the visible artifact and starve the invisible systems that make impact possible. The result is lock-in: a shiny platform that attracts complementary investments and standards, even if it is pointed at a trivial use case, thereby prohibiting more meaningful directions.
Kamen speaks from experience. As the creator of devices from insulin pumps to mobility aids, and as the founder of FIRST Robotics, he has long argued for problem-first engineering. The Segway became a symbol of futuristic tech, yet its fate hinged less on gyroscopes and more on sidewalks, norms, and urban policy. His point is not anti-play. Exploration and tinkering spark discoveries. But play becomes a trap when it replaces purpose rather than serving it.
A better pattern starts with a clear statement of importance: who is helped, what constraints matter, how success will be measured. It continues with humility about nontechnical barriers and a willingness to redesign around them. It prioritizes boring excellence over spectacular demos and treats adoption as part of the design brief, not an afterthought.
The quote is a reminder to ask, at every milestone, so what? If the answer grows fuzzier as the tech grows shinier, it is time to step back. Curiosity is powerful. Anchored to purpose, it becomes innovation. Unmoored, it is only play.
This can happen through simple attention capture. The immediate rewards lie in speed, specs, and cleverness; the harder tasks are integration, adoption, behavior change, policy, and business models. Money, talent, and time pile into the visible artifact and starve the invisible systems that make impact possible. The result is lock-in: a shiny platform that attracts complementary investments and standards, even if it is pointed at a trivial use case, thereby prohibiting more meaningful directions.
Kamen speaks from experience. As the creator of devices from insulin pumps to mobility aids, and as the founder of FIRST Robotics, he has long argued for problem-first engineering. The Segway became a symbol of futuristic tech, yet its fate hinged less on gyroscopes and more on sidewalks, norms, and urban policy. His point is not anti-play. Exploration and tinkering spark discoveries. But play becomes a trap when it replaces purpose rather than serving it.
A better pattern starts with a clear statement of importance: who is helped, what constraints matter, how success will be measured. It continues with humility about nontechnical barriers and a willingness to redesign around them. It prioritizes boring excellence over spectacular demos and treats adoption as part of the design brief, not an afterthought.
The quote is a reminder to ask, at every milestone, so what? If the answer grows fuzzier as the tech grows shinier, it is time to step back. Curiosity is powerful. Anchored to purpose, it becomes innovation. Unmoored, it is only play.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Dean
Add to List
