"In the case of composite colour, an infinity of systems must be obtained for maxima infinitely slight and with an infinity of interval values separating them - that is to say, the whole thickness of the sensitive layer is occupied in continuous manner by these maxima"
About this Quote
Lippmann is doing something slyly radical here: he turns color from a painterly surface effect into a spatial event happening inside matter. The sentence is dense because the claim is dense. “Composite colour” isn’t a simple pigment mixture; it’s the real-world mess of wavelengths that make up what we perceive as a single hue. To reproduce that faithfully, he argues, you don’t get to pick a few convenient layers or discrete bands. You need “an infinity of systems”: effectively countless microscopic standing-wave patterns, each with “maxima infinitely slight,” packed so tightly that the sensitive photographic emulsion is filled continuously.
The intent is technical, but the subtext is philosophical. Lippmann is insisting that accurate representation requires surrendering to continuity. Nature doesn’t offer clean steps; it offers gradients. His language (“whole thickness… occupied… in continuous manner”) reads like a quiet rebuke to any method that samples or averages too crudely. This is science as an argument for precision, but also for humility: the world is more finely grained than our instruments and categories.
Context sharpens the point. Lippmann developed an interference-based color photography process in the 1890s, storing color not with dyes but by recording standing light waves within a photosensitive layer, creating a structure that later reflects specific wavelengths. The passage is him defending why that emulsion must behave less like a canvas and more like a three-dimensional archive of light. What works rhetorically is the almost oppressive repetition of “infinity”: it makes the reader feel the scale of the demand, and the audacity of meeting it.
The intent is technical, but the subtext is philosophical. Lippmann is insisting that accurate representation requires surrendering to continuity. Nature doesn’t offer clean steps; it offers gradients. His language (“whole thickness… occupied… in continuous manner”) reads like a quiet rebuke to any method that samples or averages too crudely. This is science as an argument for precision, but also for humility: the world is more finely grained than our instruments and categories.
Context sharpens the point. Lippmann developed an interference-based color photography process in the 1890s, storing color not with dyes but by recording standing light waves within a photosensitive layer, creating a structure that later reflects specific wavelengths. The passage is him defending why that emulsion must behave less like a canvas and more like a three-dimensional archive of light. What works rhetorically is the almost oppressive repetition of “infinity”: it makes the reader feel the scale of the demand, and the audacity of meeting it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Gabriel
Add to List




