"In the clashes between ignorance and intelligence, ignorance is generally the aggressor"
About this Quote
Ignorance doesn’t just sit quietly in the corner; it picks fights. Paul Harris’s line is a tidy indictment of a social dynamic anyone who’s argued with a crank, a demagogue, or a know-it-all has felt: the less someone understands, the more likely they are to treat knowledge as a threat that must be shouted down. The bite is in “generally.” Harris isn’t romanticizing intelligence as saintly or harmless; he’s observing a pattern of escalation. Ignorance, lacking the tools to persuade on evidence, reaches for volume, certainty, and suspicion.
As a lawyer, Harris would have seen how conflicts aren’t merely about facts but about status and control. Intelligence can destabilize hierarchies by naming what’s really happening. Ignorance protects itself by reframing that destabilization as arrogance, elitism, or betrayal. The aggressor isn’t just wrong; it’s defensive, because admitting complexity would mean admitting vulnerability. That’s why ignorance so often arrives preloaded with moral outrage: it turns epistemic weakness into righteous strength.
The subtext is cultural, not just personal. This is about public life: institutions, expertise, and the perennial backlash against them. In Harris’s era - the churn of industrial modernity, mass media, and rising professional classes - “intelligence” was becoming organized and visible, and that visibility invited resentment. The quote works because it captures a grim asymmetry: intelligence may win arguments, but ignorance starts wars. It’s a warning that the first move in a clash is rarely curiosity; it’s often preemptive hostility toward anyone carrying inconvenient knowledge.
As a lawyer, Harris would have seen how conflicts aren’t merely about facts but about status and control. Intelligence can destabilize hierarchies by naming what’s really happening. Ignorance protects itself by reframing that destabilization as arrogance, elitism, or betrayal. The aggressor isn’t just wrong; it’s defensive, because admitting complexity would mean admitting vulnerability. That’s why ignorance so often arrives preloaded with moral outrage: it turns epistemic weakness into righteous strength.
The subtext is cultural, not just personal. This is about public life: institutions, expertise, and the perennial backlash against them. In Harris’s era - the churn of industrial modernity, mass media, and rising professional classes - “intelligence” was becoming organized and visible, and that visibility invited resentment. The quote works because it captures a grim asymmetry: intelligence may win arguments, but ignorance starts wars. It’s a warning that the first move in a clash is rarely curiosity; it’s often preemptive hostility toward anyone carrying inconvenient knowledge.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List










