"In the draft plan, we're looking at recycling 20 percent of our garbage by 2010"
About this Quote
The line lands with the quiet menace of bureaucracy: a future-defining problem translated into a committee-ready percentage. Michael E. Mann, better known for sounding alarms about climate change, is speaking here in a register that feels almost aggressively modest. "In the draft plan" is the tell. It signals caution, provisionality, an institution hedging its bets. Nothing is committed yet; everything is deniable. The real action is in what gets smuggled into the sentence as normal: that something as material and immediate as garbage can be reduced to a target date and a fraction, as if waste were a controllable variable rather than a symptom of an economic system built to produce it.
The specific intent is managerial: propose a measurable goal (20 percent) and a timeline (by 2010) that can be tracked, reported, and used to justify budgets. The subtext, though, is about political feasibility. Twenty percent is not a revolution; it's an offer designed to survive city council meetings, industry pushback, and voter indifference. It gestures toward responsibility without threatening the habits that create mountains of trash in the first place. "Our garbage" also performs a soft collectivism, distributing blame across everyone, which conveniently blurs who profits from disposable packaging, planned obsolescence, and externalized cleanup costs.
Context matters: in the late 1990s and 2000s, recycling became the feel-good policy lever - visible, brandable, and easier than confronting overproduction or regulating manufacturers. The sentence works because it exposes how environmental ambition often gets laundered through technocratic language, where the safest plan is one that sounds like progress while leaving the underlying machine intact.
The specific intent is managerial: propose a measurable goal (20 percent) and a timeline (by 2010) that can be tracked, reported, and used to justify budgets. The subtext, though, is about political feasibility. Twenty percent is not a revolution; it's an offer designed to survive city council meetings, industry pushback, and voter indifference. It gestures toward responsibility without threatening the habits that create mountains of trash in the first place. "Our garbage" also performs a soft collectivism, distributing blame across everyone, which conveniently blurs who profits from disposable packaging, planned obsolescence, and externalized cleanup costs.
Context matters: in the late 1990s and 2000s, recycling became the feel-good policy lever - visible, brandable, and easier than confronting overproduction or regulating manufacturers. The sentence works because it exposes how environmental ambition often gets laundered through technocratic language, where the safest plan is one that sounds like progress while leaving the underlying machine intact.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|
More Quotes by Michael
Add to List
