"In the end, the Foreign Ministry had no power at all to do anything"
About this Quote
The subtext is about where power actually lives. Cutler’s phrasing suggests a government in which foreign policy is formally housed in one place and operationally decided somewhere else - the head of government, the military, intelligence services, a tight political circle. Calling it “no power at all” isn’t just exaggeration; it’s an argument that the ministry’s role is to launder decisions made offstage into something that looks like procedure. Diplomacy becomes set dressing: the institution that absorbs blame, supplies talking points, and gives other countries the comforting illusion that there’s a rational channel to influence.
Context matters because this is the kind of conclusion you reach after watching policy failures up close: crises where expertise is overridden, long-term strategy loses to domestic politics, and “interagency process” becomes a polite term for being outgunned. Coming from a lawyer, it’s also a warning about accountability. If the official organ of foreign relations has no agency, then responsibility is deliberately hard to pin down - and that, in Washington, is often the point.
Quote Details
| Topic | Decision-Making |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Cutler, Lloyd. (2026, January 15). In the end, the Foreign Ministry had no power at all to do anything. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-the-end-the-foreign-ministry-had-no-power-at-168011/
Chicago Style
Cutler, Lloyd. "In the end, the Foreign Ministry had no power at all to do anything." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-the-end-the-foreign-ministry-had-no-power-at-168011/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"In the end, the Foreign Ministry had no power at all to do anything." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-the-end-the-foreign-ministry-had-no-power-at-168011/. Accessed 25 Feb. 2026.









