"In the evolution of mankind there has always been a certain degree of social coherence"
About this Quote
Even a poet-anarchist can’t pretend the species is a lone-wolf project. When Herbert Read says that “in the evolution of mankind there has always been a certain degree of social coherence,” he’s smuggling a corrective into a conversation that often swings between two comforting myths: that society is a top-down invention (gifted to us by kings, states, or “civilization”), or that humans are naturally atomized and must be forced into cooperation. Read insists on a third option: coherence is older than institutions, and sturdier than any one ideology.
The phrasing matters. “Certain degree” is a deliberately modest throttle, undercutting utopian fantasies of perfect harmony as much as cynical claims that humans are purely competitive. It reads like a field note, not a manifesto: social bonds are not an achievement we sometimes manage; they’re a baseline condition that can be strengthened, distorted, or exploited. “Always” does the heavy lifting, turning what could be a sociological observation into an argument about legitimacy. If coherence is continuous across human development, then politics becomes a debate over how to organize what’s already there, not whether to create it from scratch.
Context sharpens the edge. Read wrote amid the 20th century’s brutal experiments in mass organization: fascism, Stalinism, total war, and the managerial state. Against that backdrop, “social coherence” can sound like propaganda. Read reframes it as something more organic and smaller-scale: mutual aid, shared meaning, cultural glue. The subtext is quietly radical: you don’t need coercion to get together; you need conditions that let togetherness be human.
The phrasing matters. “Certain degree” is a deliberately modest throttle, undercutting utopian fantasies of perfect harmony as much as cynical claims that humans are purely competitive. It reads like a field note, not a manifesto: social bonds are not an achievement we sometimes manage; they’re a baseline condition that can be strengthened, distorted, or exploited. “Always” does the heavy lifting, turning what could be a sociological observation into an argument about legitimacy. If coherence is continuous across human development, then politics becomes a debate over how to organize what’s already there, not whether to create it from scratch.
Context sharpens the edge. Read wrote amid the 20th century’s brutal experiments in mass organization: fascism, Stalinism, total war, and the managerial state. Against that backdrop, “social coherence” can sound like propaganda. Read reframes it as something more organic and smaller-scale: mutual aid, shared meaning, cultural glue. The subtext is quietly radical: you don’t need coercion to get together; you need conditions that let togetherness be human.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|
More Quotes by Herbert
Add to List







