"In the first year, 1988, I wrote and sold 3 novels"
About this Quote
There is a quiet flex hiding in that plain little sentence: “In the first year, 1988, I wrote and sold 3 novels.” The structure reads like a ledger entry, not a confession of artistic passion. Coming from a businessman, it frames writing as throughput. Not “I published,” not “I finished,” but “I wrote and sold” - creation and monetization welded together, as if the real proof of authorship is cashable demand. Even the count (“3 novels”) lands like a KPI.
The “first year” phrasing matters. It implies a conversion story: someone stepping into a new market and immediately performing. That’s classic commercial self-mythology, the kind that signals credibility to investors, partners, or future readers: I’m new, but I’m already profitable. It’s also a subtle defense against skepticism. If a businessman turns novelist, you anticipate dilettantism. He preempts that with numbers.
The date is the snag. George Stephen lived 1829–1921, so “1988” can’t be literal. That mismatch changes the line’s meaning whether it’s a transcription error (1888?) or a misattribution. If it’s 1888, it’s a striking snapshot of late-Victorian print capitalism: fast production, fast sale, a marketplace hungry for serial entertainment. If it’s truly garbled, the quote still reveals a familiar impulse: to reduce the messy, status-driven world of art into a clean report of output and revenue. That’s not just biography; it’s ideology in miniature.
The “first year” phrasing matters. It implies a conversion story: someone stepping into a new market and immediately performing. That’s classic commercial self-mythology, the kind that signals credibility to investors, partners, or future readers: I’m new, but I’m already profitable. It’s also a subtle defense against skepticism. If a businessman turns novelist, you anticipate dilettantism. He preempts that with numbers.
The date is the snag. George Stephen lived 1829–1921, so “1988” can’t be literal. That mismatch changes the line’s meaning whether it’s a transcription error (1888?) or a misattribution. If it’s 1888, it’s a striking snapshot of late-Victorian print capitalism: fast production, fast sale, a marketplace hungry for serial entertainment. If it’s truly garbled, the quote still reveals a familiar impulse: to reduce the messy, status-driven world of art into a clean report of output and revenue. That’s not just biography; it’s ideology in miniature.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by George
Add to List






