"In the perception of the incongruous stimuli, the recognition process is temporarily thwarted and exhibits characteristics which are generally not observable in the recognition of more conventional stimuli"
About this Quote
Brains love a shortcut until the world refuses to cooperate. Bruner’s sentence is doing a very mid-century cognitive-psychology move: taking something we experience as a vague stumble - that tiny mental skid when an object doesn’t match our expectations - and treating it as a measurable event. “Incongruous stimuli” aren’t just weird sights; they’re violations of the categories we use to keep reality cheap and fast. When the stimulus doesn’t fit, the “recognition process is temporarily thwarted” because recognition isn’t a passive camera. It’s an active negotiation between what’s out there and the templates we carry around.
The subtext is an argument against naïve realism. We don’t simply see; we predict, filter, and only then “recognize.” The moment incongruity jams the machine, the mind becomes briefly legible. That’s why the “characteristics… not observable” line matters: ordinary, “conventional” stimuli let cognition hide its seams. The mismatch forces the system to show its work - extra scanning, hesitation, reinterpretation, maybe even denial.
Contextually, Bruner sits in the rise of cognitive psychology, pushing back on behaviorism’s suspicion of inner processes. He’s also adjacent to his own research on perception and expectation, including how values and needs bias what people report seeing. Read now, the quote lands like a quiet prequel to everything from UX design to misinformation: when reality doesn’t match the story in our heads, we don’t instantly update. We stall, we rationalize, and in that delay you can watch cognition’s politics at play.
The subtext is an argument against naïve realism. We don’t simply see; we predict, filter, and only then “recognize.” The moment incongruity jams the machine, the mind becomes briefly legible. That’s why the “characteristics… not observable” line matters: ordinary, “conventional” stimuli let cognition hide its seams. The mismatch forces the system to show its work - extra scanning, hesitation, reinterpretation, maybe even denial.
Contextually, Bruner sits in the rise of cognitive psychology, pushing back on behaviorism’s suspicion of inner processes. He’s also adjacent to his own research on perception and expectation, including how values and needs bias what people report seeing. Read now, the quote lands like a quiet prequel to everything from UX design to misinformation: when reality doesn’t match the story in our heads, we don’t instantly update. We stall, we rationalize, and in that delay you can watch cognition’s politics at play.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jerome
Add to List





