"In the theater, while you recognized that you were looking at a house, it was a house in quotation marks. On screen, the quotation marks tend to be blotted out by the camera"
About this Quote
Miller is drawing a bright, slightly anxious line between make-believe you can see and make-believe that tries to disappear. The stage “house” wears its artifice openly: flats, lighting, the shared agreement of the audience to treat plywood as architecture. Calling it “a house in quotation marks” is a playwright’s way of praising theater’s honesty. It’s not less real for being symbolic; it’s real because everyone can feel the contract at work.
Film, he argues, is seductively good at shredding those quotation marks. The camera’s authority turns representation into apparent fact: a close-up can make a gesture look like psychology; a location shot can make a set feel like a whole world; editing can erase the seams where meaning is manufactured. Miller’s subtext is not anti-cinema snobbery so much as a warning about how easily viewers confuse vividness with truth. When the medium makes the illusion frictionless, it also makes it harder to interrogate what you’re being sold.
Context matters: Miller wrote in an era when American storytelling was migrating toward screens, and he himself was famously entangled with Hollywood’s machinery and mythmaking. His plays thrive on moral scrutiny, on the audience feeling the pressure of ideas in a room. Theater’s visible scaffolding keeps you awake; film’s immersive grammar can lull you into belief. Miller is defending the productive discomfort of knowing you’re watching a constructed world - and insisting that awareness is an ethical tool, not a limitation.
Film, he argues, is seductively good at shredding those quotation marks. The camera’s authority turns representation into apparent fact: a close-up can make a gesture look like psychology; a location shot can make a set feel like a whole world; editing can erase the seams where meaning is manufactured. Miller’s subtext is not anti-cinema snobbery so much as a warning about how easily viewers confuse vividness with truth. When the medium makes the illusion frictionless, it also makes it harder to interrogate what you’re being sold.
Context matters: Miller wrote in an era when American storytelling was migrating toward screens, and he himself was famously entangled with Hollywood’s machinery and mythmaking. His plays thrive on moral scrutiny, on the audience feeling the pressure of ideas in a room. Theater’s visible scaffolding keeps you awake; film’s immersive grammar can lull you into belief. Miller is defending the productive discomfort of knowing you’re watching a constructed world - and insisting that awareness is an ethical tool, not a limitation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List


