"In the United States Senate, we cannot do great things without reaching across the aisle and working together - and I look forward to the challenges ahead"
About this Quote
Burr’s line is the Senate’s favorite kind of promise: ambitious enough to sound statesmanlike, soft enough to offend no one, and structurally designed to shift responsibility away from the speaker. “We cannot do great things” sets a high bar while quietly redefining “great things” as whatever can survive bipartisan negotiation. It’s a rhetorical shield: if the agenda stalls, the culprit is polarization, not a lack of strategy or will.
“Reaching across the aisle” functions as a civic virtue signal, but it also smuggles in a demand. Bipartisanship here isn’t framed as a tool for specific outcomes; it’s presented as a prerequisite for legitimacy. That’s useful in a chamber where procedure empowers minorities, and where compromise is often less moral triumph than mathematical necessity. The phrasing implies: if you want progress, you must meet in the middle - and if you refuse, you’re the one blocking “great things.”
The second clause - “I look forward to the challenges ahead” - is classic forward-facing inoculation. It acknowledges difficulty without naming what the difficulty is: partisanship, media pressure, party leadership, donors, primaries. The vagueness is the point. It reads like a résumé line for governance, projecting steadiness and seriousness while avoiding any policy commitments that could become attack-ad fodder.
Contextually, it taps into a long-running American nostalgia for a more collegial Senate, even as incentives push politicians toward performative conflict. Burr is invoking the mythos of cooperation to position himself as reasonable - the kind of “adult in the room” brand that plays well with moderates and institutions, especially when trust in Congress is thin.
“Reaching across the aisle” functions as a civic virtue signal, but it also smuggles in a demand. Bipartisanship here isn’t framed as a tool for specific outcomes; it’s presented as a prerequisite for legitimacy. That’s useful in a chamber where procedure empowers minorities, and where compromise is often less moral triumph than mathematical necessity. The phrasing implies: if you want progress, you must meet in the middle - and if you refuse, you’re the one blocking “great things.”
The second clause - “I look forward to the challenges ahead” - is classic forward-facing inoculation. It acknowledges difficulty without naming what the difficulty is: partisanship, media pressure, party leadership, donors, primaries. The vagueness is the point. It reads like a résumé line for governance, projecting steadiness and seriousness while avoiding any policy commitments that could become attack-ad fodder.
Contextually, it taps into a long-running American nostalgia for a more collegial Senate, even as incentives push politicians toward performative conflict. Burr is invoking the mythos of cooperation to position himself as reasonable - the kind of “adult in the room” brand that plays well with moderates and institutions, especially when trust in Congress is thin.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List


