"In things a moderation keep; Kings ought to shear, not skin, their sheep"
About this Quote
Herrick writes as a 17th-century poet steeped in a world where monarchy is both sacred theater and fiscal machine. England had recently lived through the anxieties of taxation, monopolies, and royal prerogative under the Stuarts, with the social memory of governmental extraction never far from the surface. The line reads like counsel a court poet can safely offer: it doesn’t preach revolution, it preaches competence. “Moderation” is framed as self-interest, not sentiment.
The subtext is sharper than the pastoral tone suggests. Calling subjects “sheep” flatters neither side: the people are positioned as managed, not consulted; the king is a shepherd who can turn butcher. Yet Herrick’s real target is the ruler’s temptation to mistake possession for entitlement. Good governance here is not kindness; it’s restraint disciplined by long horizons. The wit is that it sounds like moral advice, but it’s really a warning: exploitative power is bad accounting.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Herrick, Robert. (2026, January 16). In things a moderation keep; Kings ought to shear, not skin, their sheep. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-things-a-moderation-keep-kings-ought-to-shear-106124/
Chicago Style
Herrick, Robert. "In things a moderation keep; Kings ought to shear, not skin, their sheep." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-things-a-moderation-keep-kings-ought-to-shear-106124/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"In things a moderation keep; Kings ought to shear, not skin, their sheep." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/in-things-a-moderation-keep-kings-ought-to-shear-106124/. Accessed 9 Feb. 2026.











