"In turning from the smaller instruments in frequent use to the larger and more important machines, the economy arising from the increase of velocity becomes more striking"
About this Quote
Babbage is selling speed as a moral and economic force, not just a technical parameter. The sentence looks dry, but it’s a manifesto in the language of Victorian measurement: once you stop tinkering with “smaller instruments” and scale up to “larger and more important machines,” efficiency doesn’t merely improve - it announces itself. The key word is “striking.” Velocity, in Babbage’s framing, is persuasive; it produces a visible surplus that quiets skepticism.
The intent is practical and political. Babbage lived inside the early Industrial Revolution, watching production move from craft rhythms to factory tempos, and he wanted a society that would treat calculation, standardization, and mechanization as common sense. His own work on mechanical computation sits in the background: faster operations compound into qualitatively different outcomes. That compounding logic is what he’s smuggling into an apparently neutral observation.
Subtext: scale changes the argument. With small tools, speed gains look incremental and maybe optional - a luxury for the fussy. With big machines, velocity becomes infrastructure: it dictates throughput, reorganizes labor, and reshapes markets. “Economy” here isn’t thrift; it’s a new regime of rationalized production where time becomes a unit to be engineered and extracted.
Context sharpens the edge. In Babbage’s era, “improvement” was a cultural religion, but also a battlefield over workers’ autonomy and the human costs of acceleration. His sentence embodies the era’s confident belief that faster is not only better, but self-evidently better - especially once the machine is too large, too expensive, and too central to question.
The intent is practical and political. Babbage lived inside the early Industrial Revolution, watching production move from craft rhythms to factory tempos, and he wanted a society that would treat calculation, standardization, and mechanization as common sense. His own work on mechanical computation sits in the background: faster operations compound into qualitatively different outcomes. That compounding logic is what he’s smuggling into an apparently neutral observation.
Subtext: scale changes the argument. With small tools, speed gains look incremental and maybe optional - a luxury for the fussy. With big machines, velocity becomes infrastructure: it dictates throughput, reorganizes labor, and reshapes markets. “Economy” here isn’t thrift; it’s a new regime of rationalized production where time becomes a unit to be engineered and extracted.
Context sharpens the edge. In Babbage’s era, “improvement” was a cultural religion, but also a battlefield over workers’ autonomy and the human costs of acceleration. His sentence embodies the era’s confident belief that faster is not only better, but self-evidently better - especially once the machine is too large, too expensive, and too central to question.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|---|
| Source | On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures, Charles Babbage, 1832 (original work containing this passage). |
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List





